`monitor_address_block` should be read from hostvars[host] instead of
current node being played.
eg:
Let's assume we have:
```
[mons]
ceph-mon0 monitor_address=192.168.1.10
ceph-mon1 monitor_interface=eth1
ceph-mon2 monitor_address_block=192.168.1.0/24
```
the ceph.conf generation task will end up with:
```
fatal: [ceph-mon0]: FAILED! => {}
MSG:
'ansible.vars.hostvars.HostVarsVars object' has no attribute u'ansible_interface'
```
the reason is that it will assume `monitor_address_block` isn't defined even on
ceph-mon2 because looking for `monitor_address_block` instead of
`hostvars[host]['monitor_address_block']`, therefore it enters in the condition as default value:
```
{%- else -%}
{% set interface = 'ansible_' + (monitor_interface | replace('-', '_')) %}
{% if ip_version == 'ipv4' -%}
{{ hostvars[host][interface][ip_version]['address'] }}
{%- elif ip_version == 'ipv6' -%}
[{{ hostvars[host][interface][ip_version][0]['address'] }}]
{%- endif %}
{%- endif %}
```
`monitor_interface` is set with default value `'interface'` so the `interface`
variable is built with 'ansible_' + 'interface'. It makes ansible throwing a
confusing message about `'ansible_interface'`.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635303
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6130bc841d)
the default value for _rgw_hostname was took from the current node being
played while it should be took from the respective node in the loop.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622505
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6d6fd514e0)
let's add ansible_hostname as a default value for rgw_hostname if no
hostname in servicemap matches ansible_fqdn.
Fixes: #3063
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622505
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9ff26e80f2)
the ceph.conf.j2 always assumes the hostname used to register the
radosgw in the servicemap is equivalent to `{{ ansible_hostname }}`
which returns the shortname form.
We need to detect which form of the hostname was used in case of already
deployed cluster and update the ceph.conf accordingly.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580408
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit f422efb1d6)
Since the container now simply reads the ceph.conf, we remove all the
unnecessary options.
Also this PR is the foundation to support multiple backend, such as the
new 'beast' from Ceph Mimic.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582411
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4d64dd4686)
# Conflicts:
# roles/ceph-rgw/tasks/docker/main.yml
This was introduced by
59ee2e8d3b
and made our socket checks impossible to run. The PID could be found,
but the cctid cannot.
This happens during upgrade to mimic and on cluster running on mimic.
So let's force the admin socket the way it was so we can properly check
for existing instances also the line $cluster-$name.$pid.$cctid.asok
is only needed when running multiple instances of the same daemon,
thing ceph-ansible cannot do at the time of writing
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610220
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit ea9e60d48d)
The container image recently merged both cluster and mon log into a
single stream. Following this, we now see this warning coming from the
container image:
2018-06-19 13:44:01.542990 7ff75b024700 1 mon.vm02@1(peon).log
v57928205 unable to write to '/var/log/ceph/ceph.log' for channel
'cluster': (2) No such file or directory
So we now tell the mon to not log cluster log on the filesystem.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591771
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 713b9fcf9b)
With two public networks configured - we found that with
"NETWORK_ADDR_1, NETWORK_ADDR_2" install process consistently became
broken, trying to find docker registry on second network, and not
finding mon container.
but without spaces
"NETWORK_ADDR_1,NETWORK_ADDR_2" install succeeds
so, containerized install is more peculiar with formatting of this line
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534003
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Previously we were using ceph_conf_overrides however this doesn't play
nice for softwares like TripleO that uses ceph_conf_overrides inside its
own code. For now, and since this is the only occurence of this, we can
ensure no logs through the ceph conf template.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532619
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
If a deployer uses an interface name with a dash/hyphen in it, such
as 'br-storage' for the monitor_interface group_var, the ceph.conf.j2
template fails to find the right facts. It looks for
'ansible_br-storage' but only 'ansible_br_storage' exists.
This patch converts the interface name to underscores when the
template does the fact lookup.
The path to the fact is not correct.
In any case, we will retrieve the IP address in hostvars, the variable
is the way we get the interface name according where it has been set
(eg.: inventory host file vs. group_vars/)
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510906
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Setting monitor_interface in group_vars/all.yml makes the
hostvars[host]['monitor_interface'] non-existing.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507922
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
stable-3.0 brought numerous changes in ceph-ansible variables, this PR
aims to maintain backward compatibility for someone running stable-2.2
upgrading to stable-3.0 but keeps its groups_vars untouched.
We will then determine the right options to make sure the upgrade works
but we are expecting that new variables should be used.
We will drop this in a near future, maybe 3.1 or 3.2.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
need to use `hostvars[host]['XXX']` to retrieve the monitor
interface and/or radosgw interface.
Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493920
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node
for an external ceph-cluster.
related BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426Fixes: #1670
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>