keep the ceph.conf very simple.
manage the common options such as `public_network` with `ceph_config`
module.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@ibm.com>
In order to reduce need of module
internal maintenance and to join forces on plugin development,
it's proposed to switch to using upstream version of
config_template module.
As it's shipped as collection, it's installation for end-users
is trivial and aligns with general approach of shipping extra modules.
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Rabotyagov <noonedeadpunk@ya.ru>
The pools created by `ceph-rgw` (listed in `rgw_create_pools`) now support a
`ec_crush_device_class` option to specify which device class the EC pool should
use.
It default to being omitted, which means it will use OSDs from any device class
by default.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Knecht <bknecht@protonmail.ch>
This adds ceph-*.target systemd unit files support for containerized
deployments.
This also fixes a regression introduced by PR #6719 (rgw and nfs systemd
units not getting purged)
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962748
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
When the rgw_multisite_proto variable is set to https then we shoudn't use
the IP address in the zone endpoints list but the node FQDN to match the
TLS certificate CN.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965504
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
The pg_autoscale_mode for rgw pools introduced in 9f03a52 was wrong
and was missing a `value` keyword because `rgw_create_pools` is a
dict.
Fixes: #6516
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
This adds the realm pull operation to the current radosgw_realm module.
The pull operation requires the url, access/secret key variables.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
It has come to our attention that using ansible_* vars that are
populated with INJECT_FACTS_AS_VARS=True is not very performant. In
order to be able to support setting that to off, we need to update the
references to use ansible_facts[<thing>] instead of ansible_<thing>.
Related: ansible#73654
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935406
Signed-off-by: Alex Schultz <aschultz@redhat.com>
if `rgw_zonegroupmaster` is not defined at the rgw instance level in
`rgw_instances` it will fallback to a wrong variable (`rgw_zonemaster`).
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925247
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
since `ceph-rgw` may be called from `ceph-handler` in some contexts we
should avoid rerunning it unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Add the possibility to deploy rgw multisite configuration with a mix of
secondary and primary zones on a same rgw node.
Before that, on a same node, all instances were either primary
zones *OR* secondary.
Now you can define a rgw instance like following:
```
rgw_instances:
- instance_name: 'rgw0'
rgw_zonemaster: false
rgw_zonesecondary: true
rgw_zonegroupmaster: false
rgw_realm: 'france'
rgw_zonegroup: 'zonegroup-france'
rgw_zone: paris-00
radosgw_address: "{{ _radosgw_address }}"
radosgw_frontend_port: 8080
rgw_zone_user: jacques.chirac
rgw_zone_user_display_name: "Jacques Chirac"
system_access_key: P9Eb6S8XNyo4dtZZUUMy
system_secret_key: qqHCUtfdNnpHq3PZRHW5un9l0bEBM812Uhow0XfB
endpoint: http://192.168.101.12:8080
```
Basically it's now possible to define `rgw_zonemaster`,
`rgw_zonesecondary` and `rgw_zonegroupmaster` at the intsance
level instead of the whole node level.
Also, this commit adds an option `deploy_secondary_zones` (default True)
which can be set to `False` in order to explicitly ask the playbook to
not deploy secondary zones in case where the corresponding endpoint are
not deployed yet.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915478
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
When collocating rgw with either a mon, mgr or osd, switching from
single site to a multisite rgw setup failed because of the handlers
triggered between the ansible play of the collocated daemon and the play
of the rgw. Since the multisite changes are not yet applied the handlers
fail.
The idea here is to ensure we run the multisite configuration from the
ceph-handler role before the restart happens, this way it won't complain
because of non existing multisite configuration.
(Note: this is also valid when simply changing a multisite configuration)
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888630
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
When creating a new pool, target_size_ratio was ignored by ansible module ceph_pool.py.
target_size_ratio is now used when pg_autoscale_mode is on.
Tests added to library tests.
This adds too the use in the role ceph-rgw.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Brachere <fabien.brachere@celeste.fr>
81233dd introduced a regression with the ceph_ec_profile module call in
the ceph-rgw role due the missing cluster module parameter.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
This adds ceph_crush_rule ansible module for replacing the command
module usage with the ceph osd crush rule commands.
This module can manage both erasure and replicated crush rules.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
Instead of using ceph auth get command via the ansible command module
then we can use the ceph_key module and the info state.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
Make sure the `site.yml.sample` playbook can be run in check mode by skipping
tasks that try to read the output of commands that have been skipped.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Knecht <bknecht@protonmail.ch>
This adds radosgw_zone ansible module for replacing the command module
usage with the radosgw-admin zone command.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
This adds radosgw_zonegroup ansible module for replacing the command
module usage with the radosgw-admin zonegroup command.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
This adds radosgw_realm ansible module for replacing the command module
usage with the radosgw-admin realm command.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
This adds radosgw_user ansible module for replacing the command module
usage with the radosgw-admin user command.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
When rgw and osd are collocated, the current workflow prevents from
scaling out the radosgw_num_instances parameter when rerunning the
playbook in baremetal deployments.
When ceph-osd notifies handlers, it means rgw handlers are triggered
too. The issue with this is that they are triggered before the role
ceph-rgw is run.
In the case a scaleout operation is expected on `radosgw_num_instances`
it causes an issue because keyrings haven't been created yet so the new
instances won't start.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881313
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
This commit adds connection checks before realm pulls
Curls are performed on the endpoint being pulled from
the mons and the rgws
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731158
Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
Otherwise this will generate an ansible warning about the missing
filter.
[DEPRECATION WARNING]: evaluating xxx as a bare variable, this behaviour
will go away and you might need to add |bool to the expression in the
future.
Also see CONDITIONAL_BARE_VARS configuration toggle.. This feature will
be removed in version 2.12.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
Since [1] we can use the ceph_pool module instead of using the command
module combined with ceph osd pool commands.
[1] bddcb439ce
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
We already support specifiying a custom crush rule during pool creation
in ceph-osd role but not in ceph-rgw role.
This patch adds the missing code to implement this feature.
Note this is only available for replicated pool not erasure. The rule
must also exist prior the pool creation.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855439
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
When rgw and osd are collocated, the current workflow prevents from
scaling out the radosgw_num_instances parameter when rerunning the
playbook.
The environment file used in the rgw systemd template is rendered when
executing the `ceph-rgw` role but during a new run of the playbook (in
order to scale out rgw instances), handlers are triggered from `ceph-osd`
role which is run before `ceph-rgw`, therefore it tries to start the new
rgw daemon whereas its corresponding environment file hasn't been
rendered yet and fails like following:
```
ceph-radosgw@rgw.ceph4osd3.rgw1.service failed to run 'start-pre' task: No such file or directory
```
This commit moves the tasks generating this file in `ceph-config` role
so it is generated early.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851906
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
We were only adding the endpoints to the master zone but not to the
zonegroup.
This patch fixes the issue.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839228
Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
It is common to set templated pool names in `rgw_create_pools`, e.g.
```yaml
rgw_create_pools:
"{{ rgw_zone }}.rgw.buckets.index":
pg_num: 16
size: 3
type: replicated
```
This worked fine with Ansible 2.8, but broke in Ansible 2.9 due to a change in
the way `with_dict` works [1].
This commit replaces the use of `with_dict` with
```yaml
loop: "{{ rgw_create_pools | dict2items }}"
```
which works as intended and expands the template in the pool name.
[1]: https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/porting_guides/porting_guide_2.9.html#loopsCloses#5348
Signed-off-by: Benoît Knecht <bknecht@protonmail.ch>
The '==' jinja2 operator (or 'equalto') has been introduced in jinja2
2.8.
On EL7, jinja2 version is 2.7 so the operator isn't present creating
templating error like:
The error was: TemplateRuntimeError: no test named '=='
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747206
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
Since [1] we can't use osd pool without replicas (size: 1) by default.
We now need to set the mon_allow_pool_size_one flag to true in the ceph
configuration and add the --yes-i-really-mean-it flag to the osd pool
set size cli.
[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/21508bd
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
Sometimes, these task can timeout for some reason.
Adding these retries can help to avoid unexcepted failures.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Make it so that more than one realm, zonegroup,
or zone can be created during a run of the rgw
multisite ansible playbooks.
The rgw hosts now need to be grouped into zones
and realms in the inventory.
.yml files need to be created in group_vars
for the realms and zones. Sample yaml files
are available.
Also remove multsite destroy playbook
and add --cluster before radosgw-admin commands
remove manually added rgw_zone_endpoints var
and have ceph-ansible automatically add the
correct endpoints of all the rgws in a rgw_zone
from the information provided in that rgws hostvars.
Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
Allow SSL certificate & key contents to be written to the path
specified by radosgw_frontend_ssl_certificate. This permits a
certificate to be deployed & renewal of expired certificates
through ceph-ansible.
Signed-off-by: Sam Choraria <sam.choraria@bbc.co.uk>
Since this variable makes it possible to customize the mode for ceph
directories, let's make it a bit more explicit by adding a default value
in ceph-defaults.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
In 3c31b19ab3, I fixed the `customize pool
size` task by replacing `item.size` with `item.value.size`. However, I
missed the same issue in the `when` condition.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Knecht <bknecht@protonmail.ch>
RadosGW pools can be created by setting
```yaml
rgw_create_pools:
.rgw.root:
pg_num: 512
size: 2
```
for instance. However, doing so would create pools of size
`osd_pool_default_size` regardless of the `size` value. This was due to
the fact that the Ansible task used
```
{{ item.size | default(osd_pool_default_size) }}
```
as the pool size value, but `item.size` is always undefined; the
correct variable is `item.value.size`.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Knecht <bknecht@protonmail.ch>
Guillaume Abrioux
Guillaume Abrioux
Dmitriy Rabotyagov
Benoît Knecht
Dimitri Savineau
Neelaksh Singh
Alex Schultz
Fabien Brachere
Ali Maredia
Sam Choraria