When running the switch-to-containers playbook with multisite enabled,
the fact "rgw_instances" is only set for the node being processed
(serial: 1), the consequence of that is that the set_fact of
'rgw_instances_all' can't iterate over all rgw node in order to look up
each 'rgw_instances_host'.
Adding a condition checking whether hostvars[item]["rgw_instances_host"]
is defined fixes this issue.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967926
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8279d14d32)
It has come to our attention that using ansible_* vars that are
populated with INJECT_FACTS_AS_VARS=True is not very performant. In
order to be able to support setting that to off, we need to update the
references to use ansible_facts[<thing>] instead of ansible_<thing>.
Related: ansible#73654
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935406
Signed-off-by: Alex Schultz <aschultz@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit a7f2fa73e6)
There's no need to set the rgw_instances_all fact for each node. We can
rely on run_once for that one.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
the current condition doesn't work, as soon as the first iteration is
done the condition makes next iterations skip since `rgw_instances` got
set with the first iteration.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859872
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Change the radosgw_frontend_port to take in account more than 1 RGW instance,
in it's original form `radosgw_frontend_port: radosgw_frontend_port | int`,
it configured the 8080 port to all instances, with the following modification
`radosgw_frontend_port: radosgw_frontend_port | int + item|int` we increase in
1 the port count.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Parkes <dparkes@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: raul <rmahique@redhat.com>
When using radosgw_interface and IPv6 setup then the _radosgw_address
fact doesn't use square brackets compared to the radosgw_address and
radosgw_address_block configuration.
Closes: #5325
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
The rgw_instances_all fact is supposed to be the list of all radosgw
instances from all rgw nodes.
But the fact is always using the local rgw_instances variable so this
won't work on multiple nodes.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
Make it so that more than one realm, zonegroup,
or zone can be created during a run of the rgw
multisite ansible playbooks.
The rgw hosts now need to be grouped into zones
and realms in the inventory.
.yml files need to be created in group_vars
for the realms and zones. Sample yaml files
are available.
Also remove multsite destroy playbook
and add --cluster before radosgw-admin commands
remove manually added rgw_zone_endpoints var
and have ceph-ansible automatically add the
correct endpoints of all the rgws in a rgw_zone
from the information provided in that rgws hostvars.
Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
It looks like that the service module doesn't support wildcard anymore
for stopping/disabling multiple services.
fatal: [rgw0]: FAILED! => changed=false
msg: 'This module does not currently support using glob patterns,
found ''*'' in service name: ceph-radosgw@*'
...ignoring
Instead we should iterate over the rgw_instances list.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
To avoid confusion, let's change the default value from `0.0.0.0` to
`x.x.x.x`.
Users might think setting `0.0.0.0` will make the daemon binding on all
interfaces.
Fixes: #4827
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
e695efc introduced a regression in the _radosgw_address fact when using
the radosgw_address_block variable.
There's no item there because we don't use the items lookup. This is
only used for _monitor_address with monitor_address_block.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758099
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
This change implements a filter_plugin that is used in the
ceph-facts, ceph-validate roles and infrastucture-playbooks.
The new filter plugin will return a list of all IP address
that reside in any one of the given IP ranges. The new filter
replaces the use of the ipaddr filter.
ceph.conf already support a comma separated list of CIDRs
for the public_network and cluster_network options.
Changes: [1] and [2] introduced a regression in ceph-ansible
where public_network can no longer be a comma separated list
of cidrs.
With this change a comma separated list of subnet CIDRs can
also be used for monitor_address_block and radosgw_address_block.
[1] commit: d67230b2a2
[2] commit: 20e4852888
Related-To: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1840030
Related-To: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740283Closes: #4333
Please backport to stable-4.0
Signed-off-by: Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com>
When using monitor_address_block or radosgw_address_block variables
to configure the mon/rgw address we're getting the first ip address
from the ansible facts present in that cidr.
When there's VIP on that network the first filter could return the
wrong value.
This seems to affect only IPv6 setup because the VIP addresses are
added to the ansible facts at the beginning of the list. This is the
opposite (at the end) when using IPv4.
This causes the mon/rgw processes to bind on the VIP address.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680155
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
sometimes we play the whole role `ceph-defaults` just to access the
default value of some variables. It means we play the `facts.yml` part
in this role while it's not desired. Splitting this role will speedup
the playbook.
Closes: #3282
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Guillaume Abrioux
Alex Schultz
Dimitri Savineau
Ali Maredia
raul
petruha
Harald Jensås
Rishabh Dave