When `rule_name` isn't set in `crush_rules` the osd pool creation will
fail.
This commit adds a new fact `ceph_osd_pool_default_crush_rule_name` with
the default crush rule name.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817586
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1bb9860dfd)
This commit adds condition in order to not try to customize pools size
when its type is erasure.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit e17c79b871)
This commit adds the pg autoscaler support.
The structure for pool definition has now two additional attributes
`pg_autoscale_mode` and `target_size_ratio`, eg:
```
test:
name: "test"
pg_num: "{{ osd_pool_default_pg_num }}"
pgp_num: "{{ osd_pool_default_pg_num }}"
rule_name: "replicated_rule"
application: "rbd"
type: 1
erasure_profile: ""
expected_num_objects: ""
size: "{{ osd_pool_default_size }}"
min_size: "{{ osd_pool_default_min_size }}"
pg_autoscale_mode: False
target_size_ratio": 0.1
```
when `pg_autoscale_mode` is `True` user has to set a decent value in
`target_size_ratio`.
Given that it's a new feature, it's still disabled by default.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782253
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 47adc2bb08)
Currently, the command executed is wrong, eg:
```
cmd:
- podman
- exec
- ceph-mon-controller-0
- ceph
- --cluster
- ceph
- osd
- pool
- create
- volumes
- '32'
- '32'
- replicated_rule
- '1'
delta: '0:00:01.625525'
end: '2020-02-27 16:41:05.232705'
item:
```
From documentation, the osd pool creation command is :
```
ceph osd pool create {pool-name} {pg-num} [{pgp-num}] [replicated] \
[crush-rule-name] [expected-num-objects]
ceph osd pool create {pool-name} {pg-num} {pgp-num} erasure \
[erasure-code-profile] [crush-rule-name] [expected_num_objects]
```
it means we pass '1' (from item.type) as value for
`expected_num_objects` by default which is very likely not what we want.
Also, this commit modifies the default value when no `rule_name` is set
to use the existing variable `osd_pool_default_crush_rule`
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808495
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit bf1f125d71)
We must call `container_exec_cmd` from the right monitor node otherwise
the value of the fact might mistmatch between the delegated node and the
node being played.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794900
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2f919f8971)
When creating crush rules with device class parameter we need to be sure
that all OSDs are up and running because the device class list is
is populated with this information.
This is now enable for all scenario not openstack_config only.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit cf8c6a3849)
There is no need to get n * number of nodes the different keyrings.
Adding a `run_once: true` here avoid running a ceph command too many
times which could be impacting large cluster deployment.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9bad239d77)
just like `ceph_osd_pool_default_size`, a pool size might change after an
initial deployment. Having this condition prevents from customizing the
pool in that case.
This is not needed so let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 70cf2a5846)
let's use `until` instead of doing test in bash using python oneliner
also, use `command` instead of `shell`.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 687087fd43)
in order to use the right binary name when using python cli in command
or shell module.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 13815ad3ca)
When creating OpenStack pools, we only check if the return code from
the pool list command isn't 0 (ie: if it doesn't exist). In that case,
the return code will be 2. That's why the next condition is rc != 0 for
the pool creation.
But in containerized deployment, the return code could be different if
there's a failure on the container engine command (like container not
running). In that case, the return code could but either 1 (docker) or
125 (podman) so we should fail at this point and not in the next tasks.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732157
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit d549fffdd2)
By running ceph-ansible there are a lot ``[DEPRECATION WARNING]`` like these:
```
[DEPRECATION WARNING]: evaluating containerized_deployment as a bare variable,
this behaviour will go away and you might need to add |bool to the expression
in the future. Also see CONDITIONAL_BARE_VARS configuration toggle.. This
feature will be removed in version 2.12. Deprecation warnings can be disabled
by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.
```
Now appended ``| bool`` on a lot of the affected variables.
Sometimes the coding style from ``variable|bool`` changed to ``variable | bool`` *(with spaces at the pipe)*.
Closes: #4022
Signed-off-by: L3D <l3d@c3woc.de>
(cherry picked from commit ab54fe20ec)
This commit renames the `docker_exec_cmd` variable to
`container_exec_cmd` so it's more generic.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit e74d80e72f)
Except for some corner case, it's not correct to access some other
node's copy of variable docker_exec_cmd. Therefore replace
"hostvars[groups[mon_group_name][0]]['docker_exec_cmd']" by
"docker_exec_cmd".
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Dave <ridave@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 89748d579a)
Keywords requiring only one item shouldn't express it by creating a
list with single item.
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Dave <ridave@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 739a662c80)
Conflicts:
roles/ceph-mon/tasks/ceph_keys.yml
roles/ceph-validate/tasks/check_devices.yml
After b8d580b and e9e5d5a we could have either item.min_size or
osd_pool_default_min_size using string instead of int causing the
condition to be true when it's false.
As a result, the task could try to set the pool min_size value to
0 which leads to:
Error EINVAL: pool min_size must be between 1 and 1
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
b8d580b3f4 introduced a bug when
`min_size` isn't set (default to 0).
Typical error:
```
Error EINVAL: pool min_size must be between 1 and 1
```
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
introduce two new variables to make the check that 'wait for all osd to
be up' configurable.
It's possible that for some deployments, OSDs can take longer to be seen
as UP and IN.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676763
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
The existing task checks that the number of OSDs is equal to the number of up OSDs before continuing.
The problem is that if none of the OSDs have been discovered yet, the task will exit immediately and subsequent pool creation will fail (num_osds = 0, num_up_osds = 0).
This is related to Bugzilla 1578086.
In this change, we also check that at least one OSD is present. In our testing, this results in the task correctly waiting for all OSDs to come up before continuing.
Signed-off-by: David Waiting <david_waiting@comcast.com>
This commit unifies the container and non-container code, which in the
meantime gives use the ability to deploy N mon container at the same
time without having to serialized the deployment. This will drastically
reduces the time needed to bootstrap the cluster.
Note, this is only possible since Nautilus because the monitors are
bootstrap the initial keys on their own once they reach quorum. In the
Nautilus version of the ceph-container mon, we stopped generating the
keys 'manually' from inside the container, for more detail see: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-container/pull/1238
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Add real default value for osd pool size customization.
Ceph itself has an `osd_pool_default_size` default value to `3`.
If users don't specify a pool size in various pools definition within
ceph-ansible, we should default to `3`.
By the way, this kind of condition isn't really clear:
```
when:
- rbd_pool_size | default ("")
```
we should try to get the customized value then default to what is in
`osd_pool_default_size` (which has its default value pointing to
`ceph_osd_pool_default_size` (`3`) as well) and compare it to
`ceph_osd_pool_default_size`.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
`osd_pool_default_pg_num` parameter is set in `ceph-mon`.
When using ceph-ansible with `--limit` on a specifc group of nodes, it
will fail when trying to access this variables since it wouldn't be
defined.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518696
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
description = 'Use `when: var` rather than `when: var != ""` (or ' \ 'conversely `when: not var` rather than `when: var == ""`)'
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Calling command should have changed_when false otherwise each time it
runs it will show as 'changed' and this is irrelevant.
Commands should not change things if nothing needs doing
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
As of now, we should no longer support Jewel in ceph-ansible.
The latest ceph-ansible release supporting Jewel is `stable-3.1`.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
If we want to be backward compatible with release prior to luminous, we
have to set the rule name accordingly to default values used in jewel.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
When configuring openstack, the created keyrings aren't copied over to
all monitors nodes.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588093
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
This is a follow up on #2628.
Even with the openstack pools creation moved later in the playbook,
there is still an issue because OSDs are not all UP when trying to
create pools.
Adding a task which checks for all OSDs to be UP with a `retries/until`
condition should definitively fix this issue.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578086
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
When deploying a large number of OSD nodes it can be an issue because the
protection check [1] won't pass since it tries to create pools before all
OSDs are active.
The idea here is to move openstack pools creation at the end of `ceph-osd` role.
[1] e59258943b/src/mon/OSDMonitor.cc (L5673)
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578086
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>