When using fqdn in inventory, that playbook fails because of some tasks
using the result of ceph osd tree (which returns shortname) to get
some datas in hostvars[].
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779021
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6d9ca6b05b)
9e7972a introduced a regression via the container_binary variable
which is undefined.
The CEPH_CONTAINER_BINARY environment variable isn't used at all.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
sometimes we play the whole role `ceph-defaults` just to access the
default value of some variables. It means we play the `facts.yml` part
in this role while it's not desired. Splitting this role will speedup
the playbook.
Closes: #3282
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0eb56e36f8)
- Adds loop in bash to satisfy the 1:n relation between `osd_hosts` and the
different device lists.
- Fixes some container name which were using the host hostname instead
of the actual container one.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Once the OSD is destroyed we also have to purge the associated devices,
this means purging journal, db , wal partitions too.
This now works for container and non-container.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572933
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
ce1dd8d introduced the purge osd on containers but it was incorrect.
`resolve parent device` and `zap ceph osd disks` tasks must be delegated to
their respective OSD nodes.
Indeed, they were run on the ansible node, it means it was trying to
resolve parent devices from this node where it should be done on OSD
nodes.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612095
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Now if the service name contains nvme we know we need to remove the last
2 character instead of 1.
If nvme then osd_to_kill_disks is nvme0n1, we need nvme0
If ssd or hdd then osd_to_kill_disks is sda1, we need sda
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561456
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Since we have a couple of infrastructure related playbooks
(additionnally to the roles we are using to deploy Ceph), it makes sense
to have them located in a separate directory.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>