Currently we cannot install the ceph-iscsi-ansible RPM on a node where
the ceph-ansible RPM is already installed.
ceph-iscsi-ansible should install on top of the ceph-ansible environment
without issues.
We need to include ceph_docker_registry when removing containers/images
because if we don't it will assume docker.io which is not always where
the image originated from, causing the playbook to fail.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Schoen <aschoen@redhat.com>
For some reason we changed the check of pgs but it appears it could be
dangerous because the current check might satisfied as long as 1 PG is
active+clean.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
since `-e CEPH_DAEMON=OSD_CEPH_DISK_ACTIVATE` is already hardcoded in
`eph-osd-run.sh.j2` there is no need to add `-e
CEPH_DAEMON=OSD_CEPH_DISK_ACTIVATE` as a default value in defaults vars.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
When we purge a containerized cluster we need to use the correct
playbook when redploying the cluster.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Schoen <aschoen@redhat.com>
On a Vagrant setup, every host is 127.0.0.1 and every user is vagrant.
To not have ansible do the same stuff on the same machine (the one
we connected first), we should keep the port as part of the
control path.
Also this helps in setups where different hosts might be hidden
behind the same IP, but on different ports (e.g. using DNAT).
If we're purging a containerized cluster that did not use the
raw_multi_journal OSD scenario then raw_journal_devices will not be
defined which causes the playbook to fail.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455187
Signed-off-by: Andrew Schoen <aschoen@redhat.com>
`ceph-docker-common`:
At the moment there is a lot of duplicated tasks in each
`./roles/ceph-<role>/tasks/docker/main.yml` that could be refactored in
`./roles/ceph-docker-common/tasks/main.yml`.
`*_containerized_deployment` variables:
All `*_containerized_deployment` have been refactored to a single
variable `containerized_deployment`
duplicate `cephx` variables in `group_vars/* have been removed.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
We only check for everything expect 'distro' because that
is a valid way of deploying RHCS, with preprepared repos
present on the nodes.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Problem: we could end up in situation where we would install a package
on a machine that does not have the right repo enabled. Because the
condition was set to OR we weren't pinning a particular host but just a
condition. Let's say someone sets 'ceph_origin == "distro"', this would
try to install OSD packages on Monitors.
Solution: use a AND condition to first pin to the group_name (which
identifies a set of hosts) AND then after this one of the installation
condition.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1453119
Co-Authored-By: https://github.com/zhsj
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Problem: we are delegating the set/unset flag to a monitor node but we
try to call an osd container
Solution: use the right container name.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Problem: fail to deploy a containerized Ceph cluster with ipv6
Solution: do not hardcode ipv4 when bootstrapping the container.
Now use ip_version: ipv6 to get a containerized cluster deployed with
ipv6.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451786
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
To ease the backport, I wrote a quick script.
Usage: ./backport.sh.sh stable-2.2
6892670d31 my-work
We can also pass multiple commits.
Follow up on @ktdreyer write up here:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1529
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
In addition to `196fa7e` this commit check if a container has been
already launched and delete it before retrying the ceph osd prepare
process.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Comments inside this file must be set BEFORE the option. NOT after the
option, otherwise the comment will be interpreted as a value to that
option.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
If the comment is put after the line then it is interpreted so we need
to move it before and have a dedicated line.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>