get more coverage by adding an RGW daemon collocated on osd0.
We've missed a bug in the past which could have been caught earlier in
the CI.
Let's add this additional daemon in order to have a better coverage.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
There is no point of using hosts running on atomic AND centos hosts. So
let's run containerized scenarios on Atomic only.
This solves this error here:
```
fatal: [client2]: FAILED! => {
"failed": true
}
MSG:
The conditional check 'ceph_current_status.rc == 0' failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (ceph_current_status.rc == 0): 'dict object' has no attribute 'rc'
The error appears to have been in '/home/jenkins-build/build/workspace/ceph-ansible-nightly-luminous-stable-3.1-ooo_collocation/roles/ceph-defaults/tasks/facts.yml': line 74, column 3, but may
be elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.
The offending line appears to be:
- name: set_fact ceph_current_status (convert to json)
^ here
```
From https://2.jenkins.ceph.com/view/ceph-ansible-stable3.1/job/ceph-ansible-nightly-luminous-stable-3.1-ooo_collocation/37/consoleFull#1765217701b5dd38fa-a56e-4233-a5ca-584604e56e3a
What's happening here is all the hosts excepts the clients are running atomic, so here: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/blob/master/site-docker.yml.sample#L62
The condition will skipped all the nodes excepts the clients, thus when running ceph-default, the task "is ceph running already?" is skipped but the task above needs the rc of the skipped task.
This is not an error from the playbook, it's a CI setup issue.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Using an explicitly named testing environment name allows us to have a
specific [testenv] block for this test. This greatly simplifies how it will
work as it doesn't really anything from the ceph cluster tests.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Schoen <aschoen@redhat.com>
This adds the action 'batch' to the ceph-volume module so that we can
run the new 'ceph-volume lvm batch' subcommand. A functional test is
also included.
If devices is defind and osd_scenario is lvm then the 'ceph-volume lvm
batch' command will be used to create the OSDs.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Schoen <aschoen@redhat.com>
jewel used to create a default `rbd` pool in the default crush root
`default`, we need to have at least 1 osd to satisfy the PGs for this
created pool, otherwise the cluster will be in HEALTH_ERR state because
of `pgs stuck unclean`/`pgs stuck inactive`
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Let's create a dedicated environment for these scenarios, there is no
need to deploy everything.
By the way, doing so will save some times.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
adding more node in this scenario could help to have a better coverage
so we can catch more potential bugs.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
since `latest` points to `mimic`, we need to force the test to keep the
same ceph release when testing anything else than `mimic`.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
we see more and more failure like `fatal: [mon0]: UNREACHABLE! => {}` in
`centos7_cluster` scenario, Since we have 30Gb RAM on hypervisors, we
can give monitors a bit more RAM. By the way, nodes on containerized cluster
testing scenario have already 1024Mb memory allocated.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Let's try to avoid using dashes as testinfra needs to be able to read
the groups.
Typically, with iscsi-gws we can't add a marker for these iscsi nodes,
using an underscore fixes the issue.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Update the inventory host for tripleo testing scenario so it's the same
parameters than in tripleo CI.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
The admin key must be copied on the osd nodes only when we test the
shrink scenario. Shrink relies on ceph-disk commands that require the
admin key on the node where it's being executed.
Now we only copy the key when running on the shrink-osd scenario.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Refact of 8704144e31
There is no need to have duplicated tasks for this. The rgw pools
creation should be delegated on a monitor node se we don't have to care
if the admin keyring is present on rgw node.
By the way, only one task is needed to create the pools, we just need to
use the `docker_exec_cmd` fact already defined in `ceph-defaults` to
achieve it.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550281
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
ceph command has to be executed from one of the monitor containers
if not admin copy present in RGWs. Task has to be delegated then.
Adds test to check proper RGW pool creation for Docker container scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Tudela <jtudelag@redhat.com>
When playing ceph-mds role, mon nodes have set a fact with the default
pg num for osd pools, we can simply default to this value for cephfs
pools (`cephfs_pools` variable).
At the moment the variable definition for `cephfs_pools` looks like:
```
cephfs_pools:
- { name: "{{ cephfs_data }}", pgs: "" }
- { name: "{{ cephfs_metadata }}", pgs: "" }
```
and we have a task in `ceph-validate` to ensure `pgs` has been set to a
valid value.
We could simply avoid this check by setting the default value of `pgs`
to `hostvars[groups[mon_group_name][0]]['osd_pool_default_pg_num']` and
let to users the possibility to override this value.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581164
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
let's move this variable in group_vars/all.yml in all testing scenarios
accordingly to this commit 1f15a81c48 so
we keep consistency between the playbook and the tests.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
When deploying a large number of OSD nodes it can be an issue because the
protection check [1] won't pass since it tries to create pools before all
OSDs are active.
The idea here is to move openstack pools creation at the end of `ceph-osd` role.
[1] e59258943b/src/mon/OSDMonitor.cc (L5673)
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578086
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
The NSS PKI database is needed only if radosgw_keystone_ssl
is explicitly set to true, otherwise the SSL integration is
not enabled.
It is worth noting that the PKI support was removed from Keystone
starting from the Ocata release, so some code paths should be
changed anyway.
Also, remove radosgw_keystone, which is not useful anymore.
This variable was used until fcba2c801a.
Now profiles drives the setting of rgw keystone *.
Signed-off-by: Luigi Toscano <ltoscano@redhat.com>
As of ceph 12.2.5 the type of the parameter `type` is not a name anymore but
an id, therefore an `int` is expected otherwise it will fail with the
following error
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
These are already handled by ceph-client/defaults/main.yml so the keys
will be created once user_config is set to True.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Prior to this patch, the certificates where being generated on a single
node only (because of the run_once: true). Thus certificates were not
distributed on all the gateway nodes.
This would require a second ansible run to work. This patches fix the
creation and keys's distribution on all the nodes.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540845
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
We should stop putting everything in 'all'. This is too easy and this is
error prone as well for those who are separating variables into host
type, things that you should do.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
We now run tests on the newly created ceph_crush module. Now the CI will
create a specific hierarchy for the OSD.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
The ceph-ansible upstream CI runs severals tests, including a
'idempotency/handlers' test. It means the playbook is run a first time
and then a second time with an other container image version to ensure the
handlers run properly and the containers are well restarted.
This can cause issues.
For instance, in that specific case which drove me to submit this commit,
I've hit the case where `latest` image ships ceph 12.2.3 while the `stable-3.0`
(which is the image used for the second run) ships ceph 12.2.2.
The goal of this test is not to verify we can upgrade from a specific
version to another but to ensure handlers are working even if it's a valid
failure here.
It should be caught by a test dedicated to that usecase.
We just need to have a container image which has a different id for
the upstream CI, we need the same content in container imagebut a different
image id in the registry since the test relies on image id to decide whether
the container should be restarted.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Since we have a task to test the handlers we can test a new container to
validate the service restart on a new container image.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
The --crush-device-class flag for ceph-volume is not available in luminous so lets
remove this testing option for now until it's more widely available.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Schoen <aschoen@redhat.com>
When deploying Jewel from master we still need to enable this code since
the container image has such check. This check still exists because
ceph-disk is not able to create a GPT label on a drive that does not
have one.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Andrew Schoen
Sébastien Han
Guillaume Abrioux
jtudelag
Luigi Toscano
John Fulton