Add the possibility to deploy rgw multisite configuration with a mix of
secondary and primary zones on a same rgw node.
Before that, on a same node, all instances were either primary
zones *OR* secondary.
Now you can define a rgw instance like following:
```
rgw_instances:
- instance_name: 'rgw0'
rgw_zonemaster: false
rgw_zonesecondary: true
rgw_zonegroupmaster: false
rgw_realm: 'france'
rgw_zonegroup: 'zonegroup-france'
rgw_zone: paris-00
radosgw_address: "{{ _radosgw_address }}"
radosgw_frontend_port: 8080
rgw_zone_user: jacques.chirac
rgw_zone_user_display_name: "Jacques Chirac"
system_access_key: P9Eb6S8XNyo4dtZZUUMy
system_secret_key: qqHCUtfdNnpHq3PZRHW5un9l0bEBM812Uhow0XfB
endpoint: http://192.168.101.12:8080
```
Basically it's now possible to define `rgw_zonemaster`,
`rgw_zonesecondary` and `rgw_zonegroupmaster` at the intsance
level instead of the whole node level.
Also, this commit adds an option `deploy_secondary_zones` (default True)
which can be set to `False` in order to explicitly ask the playbook to
not deploy secondary zones in case where the corresponding endpoint are
not deployed yet.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915478
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
The ceph restapi configuration was only available until Luminous
release so we don't need those leftovers for nautilus+.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
Few fixes on systemd unit templates for node_exporter and
alertmanager container parameters.
Added the ability to use a dedicated instance to deploy the
dashboard components (prometheus and grafana).
This commit also introduces the grafana_group_name variable
to refer grafana group and keep consistency with the other
groups.
During the integration with TripleO some grafana/prometheus
template variables resulted undefined. This commit adds the
ability to check if the group exist and create, accordingly,
different job groups in prometheus template.
Signed-off-by: fmount <fpantano@redhat.com>
This commit reorganizes the testing directory layout.
The idea is to have more consistency with the names of scenario and
their corresponding path, eg: non-container vs. container: each scenario
has a subdirectory for container deployment.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>