Resolves issue: Multiple RGW Ceph.conf Issue #1258
In multi-RGW setup, in ceph.conf the RGW sections
contain identical bind IP in civetweb line. So this
modification fixes that issue and puts the right IP
for each RGW.
Signed-off-by: SirishaGuduru SGuduru@walmartlabs.com
Modified ceph-defaults and ran generate_group_vars_sample.sh
group_vars/osds.yml.sample and group_vars/rhcs.yml.sample are
not part of the changes. But they got modified when
generate_group_vars_sample.sh is ran to generate group_vars/
all.yml.sample.
Uncommented added variables in ceph-defaults
Updated tests by adding value for radosgw_interface
Added radosgw_interface to centos cluster tests
Modified ceph-rgw role,rebased and ran generate_group_vars_sample.sh
In ceph-rgw role removed check_mandatory_vars.yml.
Rebased on master.
Ran generate_group_vars_sample.sh and then the below files got
modified.
There is only two main scenarios now:
* collocated: everything remains on the same device:
- data, db, wal for bluestore
- data and journal for filestore
* non-collocated: dedicated device for some of the component
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Since ceph.conf.j2 has been updated to add ipv6 support, the different
variables in many scenarios need to be updated.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Without this, we don't test the mgr role so we need to add it.
Co-Authored-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
The Ceph Manager daemon (ceph-mgr) runs alongside monitor daemons, to
provide additional monitoring and interfaces to external monitoring and
management systems.
Only works as of the Kraken release.
Co-Authored-By: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Just for clarity and because we can we now show the name of the
ceph configuration file that is generated.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
We need to test the cluster name support in this CI as well. This
commit might be prone to debate because it tests 2 things in a single
scenario. We first test our ability to deploy a cluster AND the cluster
name support. However it's easier to do it this way and will reduce the
amount of time for testingg. If we don't do this we will have a
duplicate those 2 existing tests into new ones 'only' to test the
cluster name support.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
SirishaGuduru
Sébastien Han
Andrew Schoen
Guillaume Abrioux
Ali Maredia