When playing ceph-mds role, mon nodes have set a fact with the default
pg num for osd pools, we can simply default to this value for cephfs
pools (`cephfs_pools` variable).
At the moment the variable definition for `cephfs_pools` looks like:
```
cephfs_pools:
- { name: "{{ cephfs_data }}", pgs: "" }
- { name: "{{ cephfs_metadata }}", pgs: "" }
```
and we have a task in `ceph-validate` to ensure `pgs` has been set to a
valid value.
We could simply avoid this check by setting the default value of `pgs`
to `hostvars[groups[mon_group_name][0]]['osd_pool_default_pg_num']` and
let to users the possibility to override this value.
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581164
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
let's move this variable in group_vars/all.yml in all testing scenarios
accordingly to this commit 1f15a81c48 so
we keep consistency between the playbook and the tests.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
We now have a variable called ceph_pools that is mandatory when
deploying a MDS.
It's a dictionnary that contains a pool name and a PG count. PG count is
mandatory and must be set, the playbook will fail otherwise.
Closes: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/issues/2017
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
the path `/dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:01.1-ata-1.0` doesn't exist.
it has to be changed to `/dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:01.1-ata-1`
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
This commit refacts the code regarding all `set_osd_pool_default_*`
related tasks by avoiding usage of useless `set_fact` to determine
whether a key is present in `ceph_conf_overrides`.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
The installation process is now described as follow:
* you still have to choose a 'ceph_origin' installation method. The
origin can be a 'repository' (add a new repository), distro (it will use
the packages provided by the native repo source of your distribution),
local (only available on redhat system, it installs locally built
packages). This option is not well tested, so use it carefully
* if ceph_origin == 'repository' you will have to decide what kind of
repository you want to enable:
- community: corresponds to the stable upstream/community version
- enterprise: corresponds to the stable enterprise/downstream version
(basically you are a red hat customer)
- dev: it will install ceph from packages built out of the github
development branches
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-Authored-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Resolves issue: Multiple RGW Ceph.conf Issue #1258
In multi-RGW setup, in ceph.conf the RGW sections
contain identical bind IP in civetweb line. So this
modification fixes that issue and puts the right IP
for each RGW.
Signed-off-by: SirishaGuduru SGuduru@walmartlabs.com
Modified ceph-defaults and ran generate_group_vars_sample.sh
group_vars/osds.yml.sample and group_vars/rhcs.yml.sample are
not part of the changes. But they got modified when
generate_group_vars_sample.sh is ran to generate group_vars/
all.yml.sample.
Uncommented added variables in ceph-defaults
Updated tests by adding value for radosgw_interface
Added radosgw_interface to centos cluster tests
Modified ceph-rgw role,rebased and ran generate_group_vars_sample.sh
In ceph-rgw role removed check_mandatory_vars.yml.
Rebased on master.
Ran generate_group_vars_sample.sh and then the below files got
modified.
There is only two main scenarios now:
* collocated: everything remains on the same device:
- data, db, wal for bluestore
- data and journal for filestore
* non-collocated: dedicated device for some of the component
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Since ceph.conf.j2 has been updated to add ipv6 support, the different
variables in many scenarios need to be updated.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
We need to test the cluster name support in this CI as well. This
commit might be prone to debate because it tests 2 things in a single
scenario. We first test our ability to deploy a cluster AND the cluster
name support. However it's easier to do it this way and will reduce the
amount of time for testingg. If we don't do this we will have a
duplicate those 2 existing tests into new ones 'only' to test the
cluster name support.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
jtudelag
Guillaume Abrioux
Sébastien Han
Ali Maredia
SirishaGuduru
Andrew Schoen