John Fulton e6e6bd078a Refer to expected-num-ojects as expected_num_objects, not size ... Follow up patch to PR 2432 [1] which replaces "size" (sorry if the original bug used that term, which can be confusing) with expected_num_objects as is used in the Ceph documentation [2]. [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/2432/files [2] http://docs.ceph.com/docs/jewel/rados/operations/pools		2018-03-26 15:41:51 +02:00
..
all	ci: re-arrange group_vars files	2018-03-14 14:22:00 +01:00
clients	Refer to expected-num-ojects as expected_num_objects, not size	2018-03-26 15:41:51 +02:00
mons	Refer to expected-num-ojects as expected_num_objects, not size	2018-03-26 15:41:51 +02:00
osds	ci: re-arrange group_vars files	2018-03-14 14:22:00 +01:00
rgws	ci: add copy_admin_key test to container scenario	2018-03-02 20:59:10 +00:00