Commit Graph

3 Commits (25a5a22cbd35de8a9a639f5c1eb0d6ed8c11e6e4)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Quinn Dawkins 494089d53d
Clang format refresh (#2812)
After noticing a number of commits with unrelated formatting changes,
I think something was changed with clang-format at one point and we're
seeing a number of unrelated changes. Doing a refresh can help avoid
this.

The changes made here came from
```
find lib -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp  | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
find include -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp  | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
find projects -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp  | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
```
2024-01-29 12:59:33 -05:00
Kunwar Grover fb1dfa3126
Bump llvm-project to 6b65d79fbb4682468333cea42b62f15c2dffd8f3 (#2723)
Co-authored-by: hanhanW <hanhan0912@gmail.com>
2024-01-04 14:33:41 -08:00
Stella Laurenzo 6961f0a247
Re-organize project structure to separate PyTorch dependencies from core project. (#2542)
This is a first step towards the structure we discussed here:
https://gist.github.com/stellaraccident/931b068aaf7fa56f34069426740ebf20

There are two primary goals:

1. Separate the core project (C++ dialects and conversions) from the
hard PyTorch dependencies. We move all such things into projects/pt1 as
a starting point since they are presently entangled with PT1-era APIs.
Additional work can be done to disentangle components from that
(specifically LTC is identified as likely ultimately living in a
`projects/ltc`).
2. Create space for native PyTorch2 Dynamo-based infra to be upstreamed
without needing to co-exist with the original TorchScript path.

Very little changes in this path with respect to build layering or
options. These can be updated in a followup without commingling
directory structure changes.

This also takes steps toward a couple of other layering enhancements:

* Removes the llvm-external-projects/torch-mlir-dialects sub-project,
collapsing it into the main tree.
* Audits and fixes up the core C++ build to account for issues found
while moving things. This is just an opportunistic pass through but
roughly ~halves the number of build actions for the project from the
high 4000's to the low 2000's.

It deviates from the discussed plan by having a `projects/` tree instead
of `compat/`. As I was thinking about it, this will better accommodate
the follow-on code movement.

Once things are roughly in place and the CI passing, followups will
focus on more in-situ fixes and cleanups.
2023-11-02 19:45:55 -07:00