Commit Graph

21 Commits (2dbab50444e9c30eabbd3355a47545c0650fd100)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sean Silva f49ebf1690 Add `!torch.int` type.
This replaces the ad-hoc use of `i64` throughout the Torch layer, and
helps to keep it crystal clear the distinction between `!torch.int`
(which is modeling the Python `int` type) and the various types that
serve as dtypes of tensors, which are a totally different type universe.

Changes:
- `!torch.int` type and C bindings.
- Change `torch.constant.int` parser to not need the `: i64` at the end.
- `m_TorchConstantInt` matcher to aid with matching constants.
- BackendTypeConversion changes for `!torch.int` -> `i64` type
  conversion.
- Refactor finalizing patterns in FinalizingBackendTypeConversionPass
  (they were getting very repetitive).
- Mechanical rewriting of `!torch.int` to `i64` in all the tests, and
  `AnyTorchIntType` to `Torch_IntType` in the `.td` files.
2021-06-17 07:28:23 -07:00
Sean Silva 8860b5c55d Add `torch.prim.If`
This removes the use of `scf.if`, which required laundering back and
forth between `i1` and `!torch.bool` in the frontend. We will eventually
lower this op to `scf.if`, but this results in a cleaner IR and layering
at the frontend.
2021-06-16 14:04:31 -07:00
Sean Silva 784156a998 Add `!torch.bool` type.
This finishes removing the dependence on the basicpy dialect!

Changes:
- Add `!torch.bool` type and replace use of `!basicpy.BoolType` in
  Torch-related code.
- Rename BuiltinTensorize to BackendTypeConversion since now it handles
  bool conversions (and, when we add !torch.int and !torch.float, it
  will handle those as well), and generalize the related utilities (I
  also moved them to Torch/Transforms since they aren't really part of
  Torch/IR).
  - Add `torch.to_i1` and `torch.from_i1` ops for materializations
- [cleanup] Reorganize `torch.constant.*` ops in TorchOps.td
- Remove dependency of `torch` dialect on `basicpy` dialect and also
  `std` dialect. For `std`, we use some call related ops, but the
  `torch` dialect itself never produces them (we have passes that do
  though).

This is fairly mechanical. Recommended review order:
- New stuff in Torch/IR
- New BuiltinTypeConversion files.
- Mechnical fixups elsewhere.
2021-06-16 13:22:00 -07:00
Sean Silva 3ccf6002af Add `torch.constant.int` and `torch.constant.float`.
- This removes reliance on basicpy.numeric_constant.
- Also, add OpAsmOpInterface to the `torch.constant.none` and
  `torch.constant.str` ops.
2021-06-15 15:29:42 -07:00
Sean Silva 2e850ecb72 Add !torch.str type.
- Remove dependence on `!basicpy.BytesType`.
- Add `torch.constant.str "s"` analogous to `torch.constant.none`.
2021-06-15 10:10:59 -07:00
Sean Silva 92ee0fa98f Add `!torch.tuple<T1, T2>` type.
This further eliminates the need for the `basicpy` dependency.

This required adding `torch.prim.TupleConstruct` to replace
`basicpy.build_tuple`.
2021-06-15 08:15:22 -07:00
Sean Silva db282fd1b4 Introduce native `!torch.none` type.
- Add `torch.constant.none` op to construct it (naming is chosen to be
  analogous to Torch's representation of a prim::Constant with
  NoneType, rather than using the "singleton" terminology of Basicpy).
2021-06-14 13:30:58 -07:00
Yi Zhang e0ff5248fb Add TorchList type and prim::ListConstruct #218 2021-06-10 14:31:35 -07:00
Sean Silva 370e3270ab Introduce `!torch.tensor` / `!torch.vtensor` types.
This removes our reliance on the numpy dialect and avoids our off-label
use of the builtin tnesor type for modeling unknown dtypes.  The
`!torch.vtensor` (`ValueTensorType`) type is a value-semantic tensor.
The `!torch.tensor` (`NonValueTensorType`) type is a non-value-semantic
tensor. The new types look as follows syntactically:

```
// Least-static-information, non-value-semantic tensor.
!torch.tensor
// Explicit form of least-static-information variant.
!torch.tensor<*,unk>
// Least-static-information, value-semantic tensor.
!torch.vtensor
// Explicit form of least-static-information variant.
!torch.vtensor<*,unk>
// Fixed-set of allowable element types, with first-class support for
// Torch's frontend signedness semantics.
!torch.tensor<*,si32>
// First-class support for unknown dtypes.
!torch.tensor<[?,?,?],unk>
// Standard MLIR representation of `?` for unknown dimensions.
!torch.tensor<[?,2,?,4],unk>
// Statically shaped / dtyped example.
!torch.vtensor<[1,2,3,4],f32>
```

This required fairly significant changes throughout the compiler, but
overall it is a big cleanup. We now have a much clearer layering of "the
Torch frontend lowering" vs "lowering to std + linalg + etc.".

At the C++ level, there is `ValueTensorType`, `NonValueTensorType`.
We also have a helper `BaseTensorType` (kind of like ShapedType) which
interoperates with those two.

Included changes:
- New `torch.tensor(dense<0.0> : tensor<5xf32>) : !torch.tensor` op for
  creating torch tensor literals in the frontend.
- Consistently use signedness for the types (except i1 which I didn't
  touch -- we need to sort out the situation with !basicpy.BoolType
  there anyway so will be attending to that soon)
- Frontend can annotate whether an argument to the function has value
  semantics. We currently require this, as our backend contract does not
  currently allow us to even model the non-value-semantic case. Before,
  the value-semantic assumption was randomly injected in the middle of
  the pass pipeline.
- Move ArrayToTensor (now called MaximizeValueSemantics) and
  RefinePublicReturn passes to torch dialect.
- The TorchToStd and TorchToLinalg passes are now type conversions from
  `!torch.vtensor` to `tensor` and use the dialect conversion infra.
  The overall conversion pipeline is set up following the best practices
  of the "Type Conversions the Not-So-Hard Way" talk. This required
  introducing `torch-func-builtin-tensorize` and
  `torch-finalizing-builtin-tensorize` passes analogous to the upstream
  bufferization passes with the corresponding names (mostly just
  copypasta from there).
- Misc Torch-level canonicalizations -- we now cleanly layer the
  lowering to std later in the pipeline, so we are gradually lessening
  our reliance on random std constant folding before we get to that
  point.

Recommended review order:
- New types in TorchTypes.td/TorchTypes.h/TorchDialect.cpp
- New ops in TorchOps.td / TorchOps.cpp
- Less important / more mechanical stuff
  - Frontend changes.
  - Pass changes/additions in `Torch/Transforms` and `Conversion/`
2021-06-10 10:56:48 -07:00
Sean Silva 2efda323ff Significantly restructure torch/aten import design.
This is a really major and invasive restructuring of the way we get
torch operators (`torch::jit::Operator` / `c10::OperatorHandle`) into
MLIR. Please forgive the challenging review, but due to the sheer
invasiveness, it wasn't really practical do do it in sane smaller
pieces.

This fully replaces everything that was already working on the
TorchScript path (actually, more -- we added tanh support to
TorchToLinalg in order to delete the older code paths). Additionally,
I've kept the lights on for the acap path too, including what little e2e
stuff was working before (for expediency I made a few tiny compromises
along the way that will be easy to undo when we give that path proper
attention).

Overview of the new design:
- The torch operator `somens::someunqualname.someoverloadname` is
  imported as `torch.somens.someunqualname.someoverloadname` (skip the
  last dotted part if the overload name is empty), OR, if we don't have
  such an op registered, it is imported as
  `torch.operator "somens.someunqualname.someoverloadname" (...) : ...`.
  - The addition of the "overload name" is a critical element here, as
    the `(ns,unqual,overload)` triple is unique, which solves a lot of
    problems we were having.
  - This involves having separate MLIR ops for the `trailing_` and
    `.out` variants and all the different overloads. This seemed
    necessary, because the set of overloads is so wild and varied and
    unstructured. The previous design was leaning into some underlying
    structure that just isn't there -- the default situation is
    the "random overload that we want to manage on the MLIR side",
    rather than that being an exception. E.g.  `aten::ne` (not-equal)
    has 21 overloads, only 4 of which are c10 dispatcher ops see
    [gist](https://gist.github.com/silvasean/190ba918c550c956260e21254e1b8aa1),
    and the "out" variant is really called `.Tensor_out` instead of
    `.out` as it frequently is for other ops.
  - Rationale for all being in `torch` namespace: the set of operators
    are so varied and unstructured that "dialect per namespace"
    doesn't result in anything resembling the typical MLIR dialect
    boundary expectations. We could maybe draw the boundary at
    dispatcher ops vs non-dispatcher ops, but that doesn't seem to
    really result in very much useful structure at this point in time.
  - Note: within the torch operator registry, we effectively have a
    mini-basicpy subdialect (already type-resolved), which is reasonably
    structured.
  - The existing Torch op interfaces are also removed -- now that we
    track the overload name, we can losslessly find the original
    operator.
- Instead of `ATenRecognizeKernelsPass`, we now have a
  `ReduceOpVariantsPass` that keys off certain traits (and perhaps
  eventually interfaces) to reduce variants of ops to a smaller set,
  ideally operating on immutable tensors and using surrounding ops to
  model the mutability/aliasing aspects.
  - Note: `torch.ns.unqual.overload` ops allow both immutable and
    mutable tensors (unlike the previous hard distinction in the common
    case). This is a premonition for a future change that will introduce a
    bona fide `!torch.tensor` type that will clean up a bunch of stuff.
- `TorchToLinalg` / `TorchToStd` supercede the existing
  "ATen->TCF->TCP->Linalg" path.
- The new `torch_ods_gen.py` supercedes `torch_signature_ods_gen.py`.
  It should look somewhat familiar, but the benefit of hindsight has
  allowed a lot of simplifications.

The overall trend seems to be to make the `torch` dialect a nice layer
independent of anything else. It feels like as a natural result of
various future changes we will be removing the reliance on basicpy+numpy
dialects and have a nice self-contained type system too that properly
models the TorchScript type system (including proper subtyping,
mutable/immutable tensors, optional dtype, etc.).

Recommended review order:
- Start at some of the new import IR, e.g. in
  `frontends/pytorch/test/node_import/prim.py`,
  `frontends/pytorch/test/acap_export/test_export_add3.py`, and other
  tests.
- `frontends/pytorch/python/torch_mlir_utils/codegen/torch_ods_gen.py`
  and associated generated files:
  - `include/npcomp/Dialect/Torch/IR/GeneratedAtenOps.td`
  - `include/npcomp/Dialect/Torch/IR/GeneratedPrimOps.td`
- Inspect `ReduceOpVariants.cpp` / `reduce-op-variants.mlir` and the new
  traits in `include/npcomp/Dialect/Torch/IR/TorchTraits.h`
- Various code changes in the import path in
  `frontends/pytorch/csrc/builder`. Probably most interesting is the new
  code in `torch_to_mlir_utils.cpp` that has the logic to create the
  `torch.operator` ops or `torch.ns.unqual.overload` ops.

This is the [new ResNet IR](https://gist.github.com/silvasean/5407aafb710d07612b7b5b92eabecebe),
just to be able to look at a substantial sample of IR in the new style.
2021-05-19 13:37:39 -07:00
Sean Silva 3a890aa26c Miscellaneous changes while trying to work on ResNet18
- Move frontend lowering pipelines to c++ (this helps with reproducing
  failures in npcomp-opt)
- Add debugging printouts when compilation fails on RefBackendTestConfig

The experience now when a test fails during MLIR lowering is now like this:
```
NPCOMP TorchScript Object Graph IR -> NPCOMP Backend IR lowering failed with the following diagnostics:
failed to legalize operation 'torch.global_slot'
Module does not conform to npcomp's backend contract. See dialect conversion legality information above.

Error can be reproduced with:
$ npcomp-opt -torchscript-to-npcomp-backend-pipeline /tmp/ResNet18Module.mlir
```

And when TorchScript->MLIR import fails it looks like this:
```
PyTorch TorchScript module -> NPCOMP Object Graph IR import failed with the following diagnostics:
unhandled prim operation: %18 : int = prim::min(%17) # /usr/local/google/home/silvasean/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/torch/nn/functional.py:4532:4
```

Also,
- Add `--filter=<regex>` to e2e test harness to filter tests.
- Add a few prim ops that were needed to import ResNet18
- Fix torch.prim.Loop.condition assemblyFormat (it previously would not
  round-trip in the case of no loop-carried variables)
2021-04-27 11:51:11 -07:00
Sean Silva 2750d2084c Add prim::device and handle derefining for prim::CallMethod 2021-03-11 14:10:09 -08:00
Sean Silva 01b8a01e1b prim::dtype op 2021-03-11 14:10:09 -08:00
Sean Silva 43dba03afd Properly model "derefinement".
In terms of IR structure, TorchScript allows types to vary in many
circumstances where MLIR requires pointer-identical types. In particular,
it is valid to pass any subtype in place of a type. For example, if an
`Optional[int]` is required somewhere in the IR, it is legal to pass a
value of just `int` (but not the other way around; see
`torch.prim.unchecked_cast`). In effect, every *use* can have a different
type.

We introduce a new op `torch.derefine` that models that impedance
mismatch. This op allows casting a value from one type to a type that it
is a subtype of to model this behavior.

Recommended review order:
- TorchOps.td for new torch.derefine (and updated docs for
  `torch.prim.unchecked_cast`)
- new test code in if.py, loop.py, function-derefine.py
- new code in node_importer.cpp for handling derefinement insertion
- function_importer.cpp and utils changes in torch_to_mlir_utils.cpp

Properly handling derefinement on function boundaries required
relayering the code so that graph_importer.cpp/.h is now
function_importer.cpp/.h because only the `torch::jit::Function`
(actually the `c10::FunctionSchema` it holds) knows the derefined types that are
actually needed at the boundary (see `function-derefine.py` for a test).

Annoyingly, this churns all the functions which are now prefixed with
`__torch__.` but that is more correct anyway (that is their linkage name
in the `torch::jit::CompilationUnit`; the previous `mb.import_function`
was actually buggy in the case of functions calling each other as it
would reference their unqualified name).

With this change, we can import `resnet18` from `torchvision` :)
IR: https://gist.github.com/silvasean/6426a5272d8a6c7caae533fce05ab704
2021-03-03 15:09:44 -08:00
Bryce Arden 1736ff0253 [prim] Add TupleIndex support
I could not find a corresponding ListIndex in prim, which seems to
translate to a __get_attr__ under the hood. I think the reason a tuple
Index op can exist is because Tuple's are supposed to be frozen, where
List operands can be mutable.
2021-03-02 17:28:32 -08:00
Bryce Arden 68338eafb7 [chore] Make variable names in prim.py more clear 2021-03-02 17:28:32 -08:00
Bryce Arden ca3a02da28 [prim] Add support for List|TupleUnpack 2021-03-02 17:28:32 -08:00
Sean Silva df4c5764da Add support for `prim::unchecked_cast`.
This arises when casting optionals, which happens a lot especially
around handling of default arguments (python `if arg is None` idiom).

In this case, the offending code for the model is in max_pool2d:
[code link](b3bf08e67f/torch/nn/functional.py (L657))
2021-03-02 16:01:34 -08:00
Sean Silva 7dfd6f697e Add support for prim::RaiseException.
Used by resnet18.

It seems to originate from a helper `_verify_batch_size`:
[code link](b3bf08e67f/torch/nn/functional.py (L2099)).

I couldn't find a way to test `prim::RaiseException` without also having
`prim::Uninitialized`.
2021-03-02 16:01:34 -08:00
Sean Silva c837dbb077 Properly import the entire torch::jit::CompilationUnit
This primarily unlocks proper handling of free functions (that is,
functions that are not methods of any torch.nn.Module).

Recommended review order:
- `ivalue_importer.cpp` + `ivalue_import/functions*.py`
- `GlobalizeObjectGraph.cpp` + test case
- misc other stuff

The `torch::jit::CompilationUnit` is basically a backing store or
"context" holding all the possible functions in the program. The
previous code was not explicitly accessing this data structure, since it
just imported the `torch::jit::Function`'s that it saw attached to
methods.

Subtly, any time a TorchScript module called into a free function, the
free function gets incorporated into the torch::jit::CompilationUnit,
but doesn't show up anywhere when dumping the module, except in the
curious pattern:

```
%5 : Function = prim::Constant[name="adaptive_avg_pool2d"]()
%6 : Tensor = prim::CallFunction(%5, %input.1, %4)
```

That is, calls are indirect calls, and are accessed via `prim::Constant`
materializing a function object. Even stranger, the `name` attribute here
doesn't really even tell the full story -- it doesn't correspond to
anything. It turns out that the c10::FunctionType itself actually holds
a pointer to the `torch::jit::Function` in the compilation unit
directly (so there is actually no indirection in prim::CallMethod,
because any two values of the same FunctionType call the same
function!). E.g. when converting the IR to bytecode, the "name" is
ignored [code link](1d6bd15790/torch/csrc/jit/runtime/interpreter.cpp (L937)).
We do import `prim::CallFunction` as a `std.call_indirect` though
because it's more braindead to do it that way (it gets canonicalized to
a direct call easily).
2021-03-01 12:08:01 -08:00
Sean Silva 59a3f46795 Add support for prim.NumToTensor
With this, we can import BERT!
```
pt_util ~/tmp/bert.pt  --import --exported-name=forward \
| npcomp-opt -torch-globalize-object-graph -inline -symbol-dce
```
https://gist.github.com/silvasean/fe7735ff5d065cc9216f7b0346d0e977

The test case here is a bit unconventional -- it isn't actually valid
Python. To figure out how to generate it I had to go search the PyTorch
codebase for "NumToTensor" and work backward. In this case I found
this
[code](649760e5f1/torch/csrc/jit/frontend/ir_emitter.cpp (L464))
which via a wild guess I was able to turn into a test case.

In this case it didn't take me too long, but when doing this kind of
"add a bunch of trivial stuff to bring up a real model", I'm starting to
think that we might skimp on test cases when it's fairly trivial and not
obvious how to test with a small test.
2021-02-26 10:16:56 -08:00