In PyTorch, the `NumberType` is equal to `Union[int, float,
complex]`. However, the abstract interpretation library was treating
the `NumberType` as `Union[int, float]`, resulting in type mismatches
when reifying certain dtype functions. This commit fixes the type
inconsistency by having the abstract interpretation functions take as
an input a `Union[int, float, complex]` for the ops that take
`!torch.number` inputs.
This commit adds dtype functions for all the torch ops that did not
previously have one and removes the pass `RefineTypes`, since the
abstract interpretation library now takes care of all the dtype
propagation.
All dtype functions added are tested except for
- `aten.embedding`
- `aten._embedding_bag`
- `aten.embedding_bag`
These functions need a change to the testing framework to allow
specifying the actual data inside the tensor used for testing. I will
fix this in a follow up patch.
Co-authored-by: Jiahao Li <liplus17@163.com>
To keep things simple in shape functions, `Scalar` inputs are
considered `float`s. This means that when inserting the shape
functions into the IR, we must cast any `!torch.number`s into `float`s
so that the operand type matches the expected type in the shape
function. This commit adds the cast from `Scalar` to `float`.
* [custom op] Generalize shape library logic to work with dtypes
This commit generalizes the shape library logic, so that dtype rules
for ops can also be expressed using the same mechanism. In other
words, each op can now have a shape function and a dtype function
specified in Python that is imported during lowering to calculate the
shapes and dtypes throught a program. For more information about how
to specify a dtype function, see the updated
`docs/adding_a_shape_and_dtype_function.md`.
For those not familiar with how the shape library works, the file
`docs/calculations_lib.md` provides an overview.