Commit Graph

5 Commits (81bcd7fb12d82e8a8fcc3f670e598692e26e5ce5)

Author SHA1 Message Date
mikeurbach 0f6a65a1c5
Enable building using LLVM_EXTERNAL_PROJECTS. (#152)
This allows building NPCOMP as an external project of LLVM, similar to
how CIRCT can be built: https://github.com/llvm/circt/pull/227.

The CMake options to use this build style look like this:

```
  -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_PROJECTS=npcomp \
  -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_NPCOMP_SOURCE_DIR=/path/to/mlir-npcomp \
```
2021-01-26 11:43:43 -07:00
Stella Laurenzo abb6fe8aa2 Port prior acap export tests to new dispatcher based versions.
* Sadly, non-trivial ones fail.
* Bugs filed and marked XFAIL.
2020-10-13 16:37:46 -07:00
Stella Laurenzo 5c5b8db70f Update test configuration to import mlir from LLVM install location.
* Also adds two lit tests to verify that all of our extensions load without fireworks, which is a good indication that the shared library deps are sane.
* Bumps llvm-project version to use D89167.
2020-10-12 15:25:07 -07:00
Stella Laurenzo af4edb63ae Start reworking towards a shared library build.
* Need to have a dag of shared library deps in order to interop across python extensions (as presented in ODM).
* Introduced add_npcomp_library and friends to mirror the MLIR setup.
* Adds a libNPCOMP.so shared library.
* Redirects tools and extensions to link against libNPCOMP.so (instead of static libs).
* Moves all libraries to lib/, all binaries to bin/ and all python extensions to python/. The invariant is that the rpaths are setup to have a one level directory structure.
* Reworks the _torch_mlir extension to build like the others (still need to come up with a consolidated rule to do this instead of open coded).
* Includes an upstream version bump to pick up needed changes.

Sizes with dynamic linking (stripped, release, asserts enabled):
  libNPCOMP.so: 43M (includes much of the underlying LLVM codegen deps)
  libMLIR.so: 31M
  _npcomp.so: 1.6M (python extension)
  _torch_mlir.so: 670K (python extension)
  npcomp-capi-ir-test: 6.3K
  npcomp-opt: 351K
  npcomp-run-mlir: 461K
  mnist-playground: 530K

Still more can be done to normalize and optimize but this gets us structurally to the starting point.
2020-10-09 16:02:58 -07:00
stephenneuendorffer 31b3041e88
Add pytorch interface to ATen Dialect (#30)
This patch adds a pytorch interface to npcomp.  This interface is modeled
after pytorch_xla and exposes the MLIR-based flow as a virtual device (similar
to a gpu device or the xla backend).  Usage is intended to be something like:

  dev = torch_mlir.mlir_device()
  t0 = torch.randn((4,4), device=dev)
  t1 = torch.randn((4,4), device=dev)
  t2 = t0 + t1
  t2_mlir = torch_mlir.get_mlir( t2 )
  t2_cpu = t2.to('cpu')

In this case t2_cpu would contain the result of the computation, and t2_mlir
contains the mlir description of the computation.  Note that this also
properly returns backward paths synthesized by pytorch.  There are several
parts of this:

1) A tensor type (implemented by tensor.* and tensor_impl.*)
2) The device modeling (aten_mlir_bridge.*, aten_mlir_device.*, aten_mlir_type*)
3) a temporary IR (implemented by ir.cpp)

There is also a reference lowering directly from the ATen dialect to C
function calls consisting of two parts:

1) The driver that uses the IR to generate MLIR, run Passes and compile the
result using mlir::ExecutionEngine (implemented by jit.cpp and
mlir_gen.cpp)
2) A runtime library implemented by lib/aten_ops.cpp.  Most of the operations
are implemented by callbacks into the torch C++ libraries.

Some aspects of this are known to be less than optimal, in particular:
1) There's some function definitions that don't live in the file corresponding
to their declaration.
2) More aspects of this (e.g. the IR) seem like they should be automatically
generated.
3) It's unclear to me how much of the 'IR' is actually necessary, or whether
MLIR could be created on the fly.

Note that this code is licensed in a way similar to pytorch, with the
intention that eventually (when npcomp reaches some maturity) it should be
pushed there.  (see frontends/pytorch/LICENSE)  The code is also structured
much closer to the pytorch coding style than the LLVM coding style.
2020-08-21 11:22:47 -07:00