Commit Graph

10 Commits (8f9d4f917db2ae26481943555c811b01ca73ea92)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sean Silva 43dba03afd Properly model "derefinement".
In terms of IR structure, TorchScript allows types to vary in many
circumstances where MLIR requires pointer-identical types. In particular,
it is valid to pass any subtype in place of a type. For example, if an
`Optional[int]` is required somewhere in the IR, it is legal to pass a
value of just `int` (but not the other way around; see
`torch.prim.unchecked_cast`). In effect, every *use* can have a different
type.

We introduce a new op `torch.derefine` that models that impedance
mismatch. This op allows casting a value from one type to a type that it
is a subtype of to model this behavior.

Recommended review order:
- TorchOps.td for new torch.derefine (and updated docs for
  `torch.prim.unchecked_cast`)
- new test code in if.py, loop.py, function-derefine.py
- new code in node_importer.cpp for handling derefinement insertion
- function_importer.cpp and utils changes in torch_to_mlir_utils.cpp

Properly handling derefinement on function boundaries required
relayering the code so that graph_importer.cpp/.h is now
function_importer.cpp/.h because only the `torch::jit::Function`
(actually the `c10::FunctionSchema` it holds) knows the derefined types that are
actually needed at the boundary (see `function-derefine.py` for a test).

Annoyingly, this churns all the functions which are now prefixed with
`__torch__.` but that is more correct anyway (that is their linkage name
in the `torch::jit::CompilationUnit`; the previous `mb.import_function`
was actually buggy in the case of functions calling each other as it
would reference their unqualified name).

With this change, we can import `resnet18` from `torchvision` :)
IR: https://gist.github.com/silvasean/6426a5272d8a6c7caae533fce05ab704
2021-03-03 15:09:44 -08:00
Bryce Arden 1736ff0253 [prim] Add TupleIndex support
I could not find a corresponding ListIndex in prim, which seems to
translate to a __get_attr__ under the hood. I think the reason a tuple
Index op can exist is because Tuple's are supposed to be frozen, where
List operands can be mutable.
2021-03-02 17:28:32 -08:00
Bryce Arden 68338eafb7 [chore] Make variable names in prim.py more clear 2021-03-02 17:28:32 -08:00
Bryce Arden ca3a02da28 [prim] Add support for List|TupleUnpack 2021-03-02 17:28:32 -08:00
Sean Silva df4c5764da Add support for `prim::unchecked_cast`.
This arises when casting optionals, which happens a lot especially
around handling of default arguments (python `if arg is None` idiom).

In this case, the offending code for the model is in max_pool2d:
[code link](b3bf08e67f/torch/nn/functional.py (L657))
2021-03-02 16:01:34 -08:00
Sean Silva 939d36906f Add support for prim::Loop op.
This is a funny one. It combines a `for` and `while` loop in one op. We
will need to write some conversions to `scf`.
2021-03-02 16:01:34 -08:00
Sean Silva 7dfd6f697e Add support for prim::RaiseException.
Used by resnet18.

It seems to originate from a helper `_verify_batch_size`:
[code link](b3bf08e67f/torch/nn/functional.py (L2099)).

I couldn't find a way to test `prim::RaiseException` without also having
`prim::Uninitialized`.
2021-03-02 16:01:34 -08:00
Sean Silva c837dbb077 Properly import the entire torch::jit::CompilationUnit
This primarily unlocks proper handling of free functions (that is,
functions that are not methods of any torch.nn.Module).

Recommended review order:
- `ivalue_importer.cpp` + `ivalue_import/functions*.py`
- `GlobalizeObjectGraph.cpp` + test case
- misc other stuff

The `torch::jit::CompilationUnit` is basically a backing store or
"context" holding all the possible functions in the program. The
previous code was not explicitly accessing this data structure, since it
just imported the `torch::jit::Function`'s that it saw attached to
methods.

Subtly, any time a TorchScript module called into a free function, the
free function gets incorporated into the torch::jit::CompilationUnit,
but doesn't show up anywhere when dumping the module, except in the
curious pattern:

```
%5 : Function = prim::Constant[name="adaptive_avg_pool2d"]()
%6 : Tensor = prim::CallFunction(%5, %input.1, %4)
```

That is, calls are indirect calls, and are accessed via `prim::Constant`
materializing a function object. Even stranger, the `name` attribute here
doesn't really even tell the full story -- it doesn't correspond to
anything. It turns out that the c10::FunctionType itself actually holds
a pointer to the `torch::jit::Function` in the compilation unit
directly (so there is actually no indirection in prim::CallMethod,
because any two values of the same FunctionType call the same
function!). E.g. when converting the IR to bytecode, the "name" is
ignored [code link](1d6bd15790/torch/csrc/jit/runtime/interpreter.cpp (L937)).
We do import `prim::CallFunction` as a `std.call_indirect` though
because it's more braindead to do it that way (it gets canonicalized to
a direct call easily).
2021-03-01 12:08:01 -08:00
Sean Silva 59a3f46795 Add support for prim.NumToTensor
With this, we can import BERT!
```
pt_util ~/tmp/bert.pt  --import --exported-name=forward \
| npcomp-opt -torch-globalize-object-graph -inline -symbol-dce
```
https://gist.github.com/silvasean/fe7735ff5d065cc9216f7b0346d0e977

The test case here is a bit unconventional -- it isn't actually valid
Python. To figure out how to generate it I had to go search the PyTorch
codebase for "NumToTensor" and work backward. In this case I found
this
[code](649760e5f1/torch/csrc/jit/frontend/ir_emitter.cpp (L464))
which via a wild guess I was able to turn into a test case.

In this case it didn't take me too long, but when doing this kind of
"add a bunch of trivial stuff to bring up a real model", I'm starting to
think that we might skimp on test cases when it's fairly trivial and not
obvious how to test with a small test.
2021-02-26 10:16:56 -08:00
Sean Silva 7b6fa27838 Rename tests to match the code they test
- `module_import -> ivalue_import`, as it mainly tests ivalue_importer.cpp
- `graph_import -> node_import`, as it mainly tests node_importer.cpp
 - graph_importer.cpp does call into node_importer.cpp, but doesn't do
 much.

This was getting pretty confusing. Also add README.md's in each
directory for more clarity.
2021-02-25 13:31:33 -08:00