Issues was found here https://github.com/nod-ai/SHARK-Turbine/issues/643
- [ONNX] Fix padding attributes for onnx.AveragePool
- [Linalg] Add countIncludePad false support for AtenAvgPool1/2dOp
- [Linalg] Add an avg_pool2d countIncludePad False e2e tests
- [Linalg] Fix conflict with AtenAvgPool3dOp
- [Linalg] Fix e2e crash with AtenAvgPool1dOp
- [Linalg] Add dynamic dim support for AtenAvgPool2dOp
- [Linalg] Fix AvgPool2dDivisorOverrideModule crash
This addresses 7 of the model failures I'm seeing in the test suite. See
[Shark-Turbine issue
#566](https://github.com/nod-ai/SHARK-Turbine/issues/566).
Need the op ```linalg.conv_2d_ngchw_gfchw_q``` to be added upstream
before merging this. See [llvm-project PR #92136
](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92136).
A small additional expansion to operand quantization is included in this
patch to address a model failure that occurs when unblocking the
quantized group convolutions in one of these onnx models.
Updates:
- some unsupported modes are now going to report a match failure for
unsupported coordinate transformation modes.
- fixes a bug that was introduced in the last patch for resize (my
bad...)
- uses actual x and y coordinates for computing weights in bilinear
interpolation (rather than eps modified values)
- slightly simplifies the bilinear interpolation payload for readability
and performance
- passes coordinate transformation mode information from an onnx.Resize
op to the mode string for the aten._interpolate op. This allows us to
perform custom logic in the torch->linalg lowering to support
onnx.Resize options without losing the default behaviors of the
interpolate op.
…cation and sparse tensors.
**NOTE**: This PR _doges_ the issue in buffer-deallocation pass instead
of resolving it. In the future, we need to fix the bug in
buffer-deallocation pass when handling code generated by sparse
compiler.
This is probably a decent PR for learning about blocks and regions.
If you're here to learn about that, consider also looking at
lib/Conversion/TorchToSCF/TorchToSCF.cpp
While this doesn't include an e2e test, it is tested downstream in
https://github.com/nod-ai/SHARK-TestSuite/blob/main/e2eshark/onnx/operators/If/model.py
---------
Co-authored-by: Xida Ren <xida.ren.dev@gmail.com>
I spent a little while debugging numerics issues with some tests similar
to the ones in quantized_models.py, only to find that pytorch's
quantized conv transpose is catastrophically inaccurate. I'll upstream
the issue and only leave the tests here which are of the form quantize
-> dequantize -> op.
For some sparse programs (and I am sure other not-seen corner cases for
dense), some passes were missing in the reference pipeline, eventually
resulting in e.g. a unresolved unrealized cast issue. This PR adds some
very obvious missing passes to avoid this situation.
This is a large change because prior to this point, Python files in the
project were not consistently formatted. This reformats them all with
black defaults.
Based on experience with prior projects, if you have a dev/long-term
branch with Python patches, you can minimize merge conflicts prior to
rebasing to include this commit by running `black` on your modified
Python files, squashing, and then rebasing/merging.
A choice was made to quantize the return type of Relu with a scale and
zero point copied from the input's quantization scheme. With this
choice, the torch-to-linalg conversion of quantized Relu essentially
computes max(input, zeroPoint) in the elementwise payload.
We can map to `tensor.reshape` for handling multiple output dynamic
shapes. Later we can perform a more complex analysis for indentifying
expand/collapse cases from the tensor.reshape.
Initially we planned to handle this identification at the `torch` level
however it will be easier to handle once converted to core
mlir-dialects.
Decomposition RepeatInterleaveSelfInt with following ops:
```python
def my_repeat_interleave(input, repeats, dim=None):
if dim is None:
# Flatten the input and then repeat
return input.flatten().unsqueeze(-1).tile((1, repeats)).flatten()
else:
# Calculate the shape after repeat
expanded_shape = list(input.shape)
expanded_shape[dim] *= repeats
# Repeat the tensor along the specified dimension
repeat_shape = [1] * (input.dim() + 1)
repeat_shape[dim + 1] = repeats
input = input.unsqueeze(-1)
# Tile and then reshape
tiled = torch.tile(input, repeat_shape)
# Rearrange and reshape
repeated = tiled.reshape(*expanded_shape)
return repeated
```
I passed the tests of stablehlo and linalg. When testing onnx, strange
things happened.
In torch-mlir's CI **torch_nightly** and my own
environment(torch==2.4.0.dev20240318+cpu), it can **pass the pass**.
In torch-mlir's CI **torch_stable**, it **failed**.
The test case is `RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic`, the result
shape should be [120].
```python
class RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
@export
@annotate_args([
None,
([3, 4, 5], torch.float32, True),
])
def forward(self, x):
return x.repeat_interleave(2)
@register_test_case(module_factory=lambda: RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule())
def RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic(module, tu: TestUtils):
module.forward(tu.rand(3, 4, 5))
```
The error log is as follows:
```
Unexpected outcome summary: (onnx)
****** Failed tests - 1 tests
FAIL - "RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic"
@ trace item #0 - call to "forward"
@ output of call to "forward"
ERROR: shape (torch.Size([6, 4, 5])) is not equal to golden shape (torch.Size([120]))
```
@rsuderman
Would you please help me check what's wrong with my PR? Thanks a lot.
Align corner modes which select what the corners mean.
Either the center of the corner points or the edges of the edge points.
---------
Co-authored-by: Rob Suderman <rob.suderman@gmail.com>