This is a large change because prior to this point, Python files in the
project were not consistently formatted. This reformats them all with
black defaults.
Based on experience with prior projects, if you have a dev/long-term
branch with Python patches, you can minimize merge conflicts prior to
rebasing to include this commit by running `black` on your modified
Python files, squashing, and then rebasing/merging.
Link to related RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-rename-torch-mlir-compile-apis-and-introduce-fx-based-analogs/76646
This commit updates the documentation, tests, CMake files, and API for
the proposed changes in the RFC. There is a new torch_mlir/fx.py for
user level APIs related to importing modules and a corresponding test
for this path can be found at test/python/fx_importer/basic_test.py.
---------
Co-authored-by: MaheshRavishankar <mravisha@amd.com>
This is a first step towards the structure we discussed here:
https://gist.github.com/stellaraccident/931b068aaf7fa56f34069426740ebf20
There are two primary goals:
1. Separate the core project (C++ dialects and conversions) from the
hard PyTorch dependencies. We move all such things into projects/pt1 as
a starting point since they are presently entangled with PT1-era APIs.
Additional work can be done to disentangle components from that
(specifically LTC is identified as likely ultimately living in a
`projects/ltc`).
2. Create space for native PyTorch2 Dynamo-based infra to be upstreamed
without needing to co-exist with the original TorchScript path.
Very little changes in this path with respect to build layering or
options. These can be updated in a followup without commingling
directory structure changes.
This also takes steps toward a couple of other layering enhancements:
* Removes the llvm-external-projects/torch-mlir-dialects sub-project,
collapsing it into the main tree.
* Audits and fixes up the core C++ build to account for issues found
while moving things. This is just an opportunistic pass through but
roughly ~halves the number of build actions for the project from the
high 4000's to the low 2000's.
It deviates from the discussed plan by having a `projects/` tree instead
of `compat/`. As I was thinking about it, this will better accommodate
the follow-on code movement.
Once things are roughly in place and the CI passing, followups will
focus on more in-situ fixes and cleanups.
Stella Laurenzo
saienduri