After noticing a number of commits with unrelated formatting changes,
I think something was changed with clang-format at one point and we're
seeing a number of unrelated changes. Doing a refresh can help avoid
this.
The changes made here came from
```
find lib -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
find include -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
find projects -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
```
Torch does not have an equivalent matmul operation for integers. Instead
it sidechannels the information via its quantized types. For this
lowering we setup these sidechannels then invoke `torch.mm`.
We can plumb the linear matmul into pytorch using its quantized types
with side channel information. To handle the final int8 operation we
dequantize and requantize.
This commit adds mapping from `onnx.pad` op to `torch.pad` op. Currently
it does not support `axes` parameter of `onnx.pad` op.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Shukla <gaurav.shukla@amd.com>
We can make the per-tensor version of the operation to the dequantize
operation via marking with the make quantized tensor component. This
introductions the `qint*` and `quint*` tensor type that can be lowered
to teh appropriate dequantization behavior during the torch-to-linalg
conversion.
We can map the per_tensor case to the `torch.aten.quantize_per_linear`
operation. In this case we extract the `scale` and `zeropoint` values
and directly invoke the quantization, then return the integer
representation value.
Implemented ONNX.Range. The spec says the data type for start, limit,
delta are 0-D can be double, float, int16, int32, int64, All int types
mapped to !torch.int and all float types mapped to !torch.float
---------
Co-authored-by: Kumar Deepak <kumar@xilinx.com>
Handles the multiple cases of `onnx` constant values and converts them
to `torch` literal tensors. This can include splats with a single
integer or floating point value, a set of explicit integer values, or
an elements array attr of values.
The expression for HardSigmoid in Onnx
(https://onnx.ai/onnx/operators/onnx__HardSigmoid.html): max(0, min(1,
alpha * x + beta))
is inherently different from HardSigmoid in Torch
(https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.nn.Hardsigmoid.html)
which is: if x < -3 -> 0
elif x > 3 -> 1
else x/6 + 1/2
That being said, it was just better to compute out the entire expression
when translating the Onnx expression to Torch mlir, which is done in
this PR. Some of the logic is shared from the files in
`DecomposeComplexOps`. Therefore, refactored some shared logic between
`DecomposeComplexOps` and `DefaultDomainGToP` and put it in a `Utils`
file.