Current StableHlo lowering strategy works well when `src` tensor's rank
is no bigger than `dst` tensor's. The new patch make it succeed in other
cases. The following is an example.
```
%190 = torch.prim.ListConstruct %arg4 : (!torch.vtensor<[1,1024],si64>) -> !torch.list<vtensor>
%191 = torch.aten.index_put.hacked_twin %189, %190, %186, %true : !torch.vtensor<[1024,768],f32>, !torch.list<vtensor>, !torch.vtensor<[1,1024,768],f32>, !torch.bool -> !torch.vtensor<[1024,768],f32>
```
* use lhs tensor's element type as compute type when rhs is scalar.
* previously `a != 1.0`(a is a fp32 tensor) will lowering to `%6 =
stablehlo.compare EQ, %4, %5, FLOAT : (tensor<2x5xf64>, tensor<2x5xf64>)
-> tensor<2x5xi1>`
* now it will lowering to `%6 = stablehlo.compare EQ, %4, %5, FLOAT :
(tensor<2x5xf32>, tensor<2x5xf32>) -> tensor<2x5xi1>`
* not to decompose `aten.amax` on `stablehlo` backend. Because it could
be lowering to `stablehlo.reduce` directly.
* lowering `aten.max.dim` to `stablehlo.reduce apply max` when
`AtenMaxDimOp.getIndices()` doesn't have users. It's more simple.
This is part 1 of ~3, formatting all miscellaneous text files and CPP files matched by a first run of pre-commit. These tend to be low change-traffic and are likely not disruptive.
Subsequent patches will format Python files and remaining CPP files.
* promote input to output element-type when lowering to stablehlo, so
that it could satisfy stablehlo's type constraints.
* split promote-to-fp unary ops from fp-only unary ops.
Decomposition RepeatInterleaveSelfInt with following ops:
```python
def my_repeat_interleave(input, repeats, dim=None):
if dim is None:
# Flatten the input and then repeat
return input.flatten().unsqueeze(-1).tile((1, repeats)).flatten()
else:
# Calculate the shape after repeat
expanded_shape = list(input.shape)
expanded_shape[dim] *= repeats
# Repeat the tensor along the specified dimension
repeat_shape = [1] * (input.dim() + 1)
repeat_shape[dim + 1] = repeats
input = input.unsqueeze(-1)
# Tile and then reshape
tiled = torch.tile(input, repeat_shape)
# Rearrange and reshape
repeated = tiled.reshape(*expanded_shape)
return repeated
```
I passed the tests of stablehlo and linalg. When testing onnx, strange
things happened.
In torch-mlir's CI **torch_nightly** and my own
environment(torch==2.4.0.dev20240318+cpu), it can **pass the pass**.
In torch-mlir's CI **torch_stable**, it **failed**.
The test case is `RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic`, the result
shape should be [120].
```python
class RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
@export
@annotate_args([
None,
([3, 4, 5], torch.float32, True),
])
def forward(self, x):
return x.repeat_interleave(2)
@register_test_case(module_factory=lambda: RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule())
def RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic(module, tu: TestUtils):
module.forward(tu.rand(3, 4, 5))
```
The error log is as follows:
```
Unexpected outcome summary: (onnx)
****** Failed tests - 1 tests
FAIL - "RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic"
@ trace item #0 - call to "forward"
@ output of call to "forward"
ERROR: shape (torch.Size([6, 4, 5])) is not equal to golden shape (torch.Size([120]))
```
@rsuderman
Would you please help me check what's wrong with my PR? Thanks a lot.
- Added linalg lowering for `AtenFloorDivideScalarOp`
- Needed `AtenDivScalarModeOp` for the decomp.
- Added linalg lowering for `AtenDivScalarModeOp`
- Moved linalg payload logic to `createDivModePayload()` since the logic
was nearly identical for both `AtenDivScalarModeOp` and
`AtenDivTensorModeOp`. Just a template function
- Added `AtenDivScalarModeOp` lowering for stablehlo
Pytorch's
[`torch.floor_divide()`](https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.floor_divide.html)
in a previous version (for a reason unknown to me) preformed a
truncation instead of "floor". The already implemented op
`AtenFloorDivideTensorOp` was done before this change. However, this
wasn't caught because our testcases only tested positive floor division.
I changed this to floor as well as adding a few test cases.
…ute_reshape_shape
as that `aten.view` support at most one `-1` in dim list. The original
calculation of `numel` is wrong when there is a `-1` in dim list.
yyp0
Jiawei Wu
Yuanqiang Liu
Xinyu Yang
Rob Suderman
penguin_wwy
Wu Yuan
Stella Laurenzo
IanWood1