This preserves sparsity at the most obvious places of lowering TORCH
tensors to MLIR RankedTensorType tensors. Other places are marked for
audit. With some initial lowering tests.
This includes custom op matching for decomposed operations and fusing
dequantization into dense operations. As a validation we compare
to the dequant+mm torch implementation.
We can plumb the linear matmul into pytorch using its quantized types
with side channel information. To handle the final int8 operation we
dequantize and requantize.
This commit adds mapping from `onnx.pad` op to `torch.pad` op. Currently
it does not support `axes` parameter of `onnx.pad` op.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Shukla <gaurav.shukla@amd.com>
The logic here is very similar to the conversion for AdaptiveAvgPool1d
#2661 with a few modifications:
1. buffVal = -inf instead of 0
2. the main linalg generic op accumulates a max, instead of a sum, to
the first output tensor
3. avg pooling requires dividing the sum pool by the kernel width, which
we stored as an auxilliary tensor (kSizeTensor). Here, the auxiliary
tensor will be recording the indices. Strangely enough, the only
signature available for this function is to return indices, and it
appears that they must be computed whether the user desires them or not.
See
[pytorch/torch/nn/functional.py](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/nn/functional.py#L1174).
Before writing other adaptive pooling conversions, the logic of this
decomposition should be rolled into a helper function that will work for
both max and avg pooling ops. Even the auxiliary tensor should likely be
automated. This code was written in a slightly more tedious way than
strictly necessary (often using loops to fill SmallVectors up to rank-2,
which is only two in this case), in order to more easily facilitate the
transition to a helper function.
convolution with [time,batch,channel] ordering, as opposed to the
default [batch, channel, time]. Currently implementing by transposing
the input and output, but may need to get its own implementation in the
future because this is supposed to be an op that gives a speedup. This
is used by fairseq
(https://github.com/facebookresearch/fairseq/issues/172).
(in case you were wondering like me, this is different from transposed
convolution. Transposed convolution has fractional strides).
---------
Co-authored-by: Xida Ren <xida.ren.dev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Frederik Harwath <frederik.harwath@amd.com>
Currently transposed convolution is not handled correctly by
`TorchToTosa`. This PR allows transposed convolutions to pass through
the conversion so that they can be handled by other conversion passes
later in a pipeline.
An example input which produces a compilation error is:
```
func.func @forward(%input: !torch.vtensor<[1,64,1,100],f32>) -> !torch.vtensor<[1,64,2,200],f32> {
%true = torch.constant.bool true
%int1 = torch.constant.int 1
%int2 = torch.constant.int 2
%weight = torch.vtensor.literal(dense<0.0> : tensor<64x64x3x3xf32>) : !torch.vtensor<[64,64,3,3],f32>
%bias = torch.vtensor.literal(dense<0.0> : tensor<64xf32>) : !torch.vtensor<[64],f32>
%stride = torch.prim.ListConstruct %int2, %int2 : (!torch.int, !torch.int) -> !torch.list<int>
%int1x1 = torch.prim.ListConstruct %int1, %int1 : (!torch.int, !torch.int) -> !torch.list<int>
%output = torch.aten.convolution %input, %weight, %bias, %stride, %int1x1, %int1x1, %true, %int1x1, %int1 : !torch.vtensor<[1,64,1,100],f32>, !torch.vtensor<[64,64,3,3],f32>, !torch.vtensor<[64],f32>, !torch.list<int>, !torch.list<int>, !torch.list<int>, !torch.bool, !torch.list<int>, !torch.int -> !torch.vtensor<[1,64,2,200],f32>
return %output : !torch.vtensor<[1,64,2,200],f32>
}
```
This MLIR produces an error about a cast operation with a size mismatch
when passed through `torch-to-tosa`:
```
error: 'tensor.cast' op operand type 'tensor<1x64x1x50xf32>' and result type 'tensor<1x64x2x200xf32>' are cast incompatible
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Srinath Avadhanula <srinath.avadhanula@getcruise.com>
Introduced in 704cfdaf08 of @wu-s-john
g++ compiler error:
Pooling.cpp:177:13: error: explicit specialization in non-namespace
scope ‘class
Design looks good, g++ is just freaking out for no good reason.
Un-nesting the template classes fixes the error.
We don't have g++ CI. This hopefully happens infrequently enough that we
can just fix manually. My service to those folks who really like
building with g++... :)
We can make the per-tensor version of the operation to the dequantize
operation via marking with the make quantized tensor component. This
introductions the `qint*` and `quint*` tensor type that can be lowered
to teh appropriate dequantization behavior during the torch-to-linalg
conversion.
We can map the per_tensor case to the `torch.aten.quantize_per_linear`
operation. In this case we extract the `scale` and `zeropoint` values
and directly invoke the quantization, then return the integer
representation value.
Implemented ONNX.Range. The spec says the data type for start, limit,
delta are 0-D can be double, float, int16, int32, int64, All int types
mapped to !torch.int and all float types mapped to !torch.float
---------
Co-authored-by: Kumar Deepak <kumar@xilinx.com>
Handles the multiple cases of `onnx` constant values and converts them
to `torch` literal tensors. This can include splats with a single
integer or floating point value, a set of explicit integer values, or
an elements array attr of values.
Handle both `torch.dequantize` and `torch.quantize_per_tensor` including
the op based quantization parameter tracking. This includes adding
`qint32` to torch types as it was missing during the initial type
inclusion.
For testing we only have `torch.int8` and `torch.float` types on
function boundaries as the `qint8` types require passing the scale
and zero point quantization information which is not supported yet.
This PR updates the torch-to-tosa conversion with following changes:
- Support torch.none as min/max input argument for tosa.clamp op
- Support negative value as start index for tosa.slice op
- Add tosa.logical_or lowering support
e2e test:
python -m e2e_testing.main --config=tosa
LIT tests:
cmake --build build --target tools/torch-mlir/all
---------
Co-authored-by: Ze Zhang <ze.zhang@getcruise.com>
Adaptive pooling ops can only be decomposed into their non-adaptive
counterparts in trivial cases.
For example, the current decomposition for AtenAdaptiveAvgPool1dOp in
DecomposeComplexOps.cpp supports outSize = inSize (i.e., do literally
nothing), and outSize = 1 (i.e., do a batched average).
The reason adaptive pooling ops are difficult to lower to linalg is that
they are not constantly strided. They are computed by taking an input
tensor of shape (N, C, Hin), and an output size Hout, and computing the
output tensor at position (n,c, h) in the following way:
1. compute st(h) = (h*Hin)//Hout
2. compute en(h) = 1 + ((h+1)*Hin -1)//Hout
3. apply a computation (max or avg) to the slice: INPUT[n, c,
st(h):en(h)]
The provided sample implementation (for ConvertAtenAdaptiveAvgPool1dOp)
uses tensor.extract to access the input tensor inside the payload of a
linalg generic op. This is likely an unattractive use of linalg generic
ops, which is why I am asking for some more targeted feedback on the
validity of this approach before attempting to support the many other
adaptive pooling ops.
Specifically:
- Is the performance of this implementation bad enough to warrant
targeting different dialects entirely? e.g. TMtensor/linalg ext/ etc.
- If the provided implementation is of acceptable performance to the
community, then is it permissable to remove the Adaptive pooling
decompositions from DecomposeComplexOps.cpp? Based on the current
structure of the -torch-decompose-complex-ops pass, it does not seem
possible to only decompose the adaptive ops in special cases (it seems
to get stuck in an infinite loop on a match failure). I would be happy
to instead incorporate the case logic into the conversion directly, and
remove the decompositions once they are rendered completely obsolete.
As long as this approach is acceptable, I can clean up the
implementation with some helper functions, and quickly add support for
each of the remaining Adaptive pooling ops.
Aart Bik
Vivek Khandelwal
Phaneesh Barwaria
Rob Suderman
lonely eagle
Gaurav Shukla
zjgarvey
Xida Ren (Cedar)
Chi_Liu
James Newling
Ramiro Leal-Cavazos
Srinath Avadhanula
Franz Haniel
Dave Liddell
John Wu
Ilija Kalinić
Andreas Falkenberg
Ze Zhang
kumardeepakamd
lisaliu1
Han-Chung Wang
Frederik Harwath
Ben Vanik