The aten.reshape ops in the decomposition are replaced with prims.collapse
and prims.split_dim ops, which means that the cases where the lowering of
reshape from torch to linalg which are not supported, are avoided.
Essentially, by using the collapse and split_dim ops instead of the
reshape ops, we are not "losing" the information that the reshapes do not
arbitrarily mix dimensions. Which makes lowering easy.
3 additional tests added:
- fully dynamic,
- dynamic only the spatial dimensions,
- dynamic only in the non-spatial dimensions.
Adds support for lowering to prims split_op.
Similar design to collapse op lowering in
https://github.com/llvm/torch-mlir/pull/2572, with some
small differences, because the split_dim op (in pytorch) is
view-changing whereas the collapse is not. The difference
means that
1) it must be registered in the function Torch::isViewLikeOp
2) it must be be added to the "expected fail" set for the torch dynamo backend.
… AtenBernoulli_FloatOp
It fixing case like: `%2110 = torch.aten.arange.start_out %int1,
%int1517, %int1, %2109 : !torch.int, !torch.int, !torch.int,
!torch.tensor -> !torch.tensor`.
`aten.arange.start_out` doesn't have value semantics also, means`%2110`
is an alias for %2109.
So I decompose it to `aten.arange.start` + `torch.contents.overwrite`.
The complex decomposition logic is target to handle cases like view and
dtype cast which I add in e2e tests.
Steps taken:
1) add generator code to torch_ods_gen.py, run update_torch_ods.sh
2) add (custom) shape and type inference generator code to
abstract_interp_lib_gen.py, run update_abstract_interp_lib.sh
3) Implement lowering to tensor.collapse_dims. Requires the `start` and
`end` values to be constant, else lowering fails
4) Update xfail_sets.py (append to LTC_XFAIL_SET) after running
/tools/e2e_test.sh --filter Collapse --verbose -c XX for all support
backends (XX).
Motivation:
- Supporting the collapse operation will be useful for lowering of
pixel_shuffle (see Issue #2559)
For static tests (that is when the shape is know) for example:
```
@annotate_args([None, ([3, 18, 2, 2], torch.float32, True)])
```
The e2e passes. But only if the replacement op's return type is set as
undefined (optional shape and type must be explicitly made unset),
otherwise there's a error about the function return type.
For dynamic cases, for example if the above is replaced with
```
@annotate_args([None, ([-1, -1, -1, -1], torch.float32, True)])
```
There is a failure to lower to linalg from torch ("view op explicitly
labelled as illegal"). This seems to be because the support for lowering
from torch to linalg with dynamic shapes is limited.
This is a first step towards the structure we discussed here:
https://gist.github.com/stellaraccident/931b068aaf7fa56f34069426740ebf20
There are two primary goals:
1. Separate the core project (C++ dialects and conversions) from the
hard PyTorch dependencies. We move all such things into projects/pt1 as
a starting point since they are presently entangled with PT1-era APIs.
Additional work can be done to disentangle components from that
(specifically LTC is identified as likely ultimately living in a
`projects/ltc`).
2. Create space for native PyTorch2 Dynamo-based infra to be upstreamed
without needing to co-exist with the original TorchScript path.
Very little changes in this path with respect to build layering or
options. These can be updated in a followup without commingling
directory structure changes.
This also takes steps toward a couple of other layering enhancements:
* Removes the llvm-external-projects/torch-mlir-dialects sub-project,
collapsing it into the main tree.
* Audits and fixes up the core C++ build to account for issues found
while moving things. This is just an opportunistic pass through but
roughly ~halves the number of build actions for the project from the
high 4000's to the low 2000's.
It deviates from the discussed plan by having a `projects/` tree instead
of `compat/`. As I was thinking about it, this will better accommodate
the follow-on code movement.
Once things are roughly in place and the CI passing, followups will
focus on more in-situ fixes and cleanups.