This commit adds the OnnxToTorch support for Mean, IsInf, IsNaN, and
PRelu ops. All high priority ops were taken so went with these. The non
trivial ones are Mean and IsInf which might require extra review
---------
Co-authored-by: MaheshRavishankar <mravisha@amd.com>
This PR contains three commits to update the validation checks in the
ONNX -> Torch conversion pass for the AveragePool, Pad, and Slice operators:
> onnx: fix preconditions for lowering AveragePool ops
>
> The `pads` attribute of the AveragePool operator specifies the value to
> pad at both the beginning as well as the end of the axis (see
> https://onnx.ai/onnx/operators/onnx__AveragePool.html#attributes), so
> the size of this attribute should be twice the rank of the input tensor.
> However, our TorchOnnxToTorch bails out early since it incorrectly
> compares the pads attribute with the rank (not twice the rank) of the
> input tensor.
>
> This patch fixes the code to match the spec and adds a lit test.
> onnx: allow optional constant value for Pad operator
>
> The `constant_value` input of the onnx.Pad operator is optional (see
> https://onnx.ai/onnx/operators/onnx__Pad.html#inputs), but the
existing
> logic for lowering the operator into the Torch dialect assumes that it
> is mandatory.
>
> This patch makes the attribute optional and constructs a default value
> (a list of zeros the size of the input tensor) if the attribute was not
> specified.
> onnx: fix checks for axes and steps inputs of Slice operator
>
> The ONNX Spec for the Slice operator allows the `starts` and `ends`
> inputs to have fewer indices that the dimensions of the `data` tensor
> (see https://onnx.ai/onnx/operators/onnx__Slice.html), but our code
> expects these inputs to be as many as the `data` tensor's dimensions.
>
> More precisely, the spec requires that the `starts` and `ends` inputs
> are only as long as the `axes` input, but since the `axes` input is
> optional, the default type for the `axes` input has to match the type
> for the `starts` and `ends` inputs. Moreover, the number of indices in
> the `steps` input also has to match those in the `axes` inputs (instad
> of matching the dimensions of the `data` input).
>
> This patch fixes the checks in the TorchOnnxToTorch conversion so that
> they match the ONNX spec.
`[build]
D:\Dev\iree\third_party\torch-mlir\lib\Conversion\TorchOnnxToTorch\DefaultDomainGtoP.cpp(734):
warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from 'double' to 'float'`
`torch` requires that padding be symmetric for pooling operations. To
support non-symmetric pad we need to separately materialize out the
padding operation.
---------
Co-authored-by: James Newling <james.newling@gmail.com>
After noticing a number of commits with unrelated formatting changes,
I think something was changed with clang-format at one point and we're
seeing a number of unrelated changes. Doing a refresh can help avoid
this.
The changes made here came from
```
find lib -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
find include -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
find projects -iname *.h -o -iname *.cpp | xargs clang-format -i --style=llvm
```
Torch does not have an equivalent matmul operation for integers. Instead
it sidechannels the information via its quantized types. For this
lowering we setup these sidechannels then invoke `torch.mm`.
This commit adds mapping from `onnx.pad` op to `torch.pad` op. Currently
it does not support `axes` parameter of `onnx.pad` op.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Shukla <gaurav.shukla@amd.com>
The expression for HardSigmoid in Onnx
(https://onnx.ai/onnx/operators/onnx__HardSigmoid.html): max(0, min(1,
alpha * x + beta))
is inherently different from HardSigmoid in Torch
(https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.nn.Hardsigmoid.html)
which is: if x < -3 -> 0
elif x > 3 -> 1
else x/6 + 1/2
That being said, it was just better to compute out the entire expression
when translating the Onnx expression to Torch mlir, which is done in
this PR. Some of the logic is shared from the files in
`DecomposeComplexOps`. Therefore, refactored some shared logic between
`DecomposeComplexOps` and `DefaultDomainGToP` and put it in a `Utils`
file.
The three remaining compare operations
onnx.Greater
onnx.Less
onnx.GreaterOrEqual
Are also added with this push request.
This concludes a set of basic tensor compare functions.
Adds a pipeline to convert custom ops and metadata represented as
`torch.operator` custom ops to corresponding `torch` ops where possible.
This is part of a multi-part approach for building ONNX import in as a
regular feature of torch-mlir. It is focused on the conversions vs the
infra. We will end up maintaining a [pure-python
importer](https://github.com/nod-ai/SHARK-Turbine/blob/main/python/shark_turbine/importers/onnx_importer.py)
to go with this in torch-mlir, and we will also maintain test case
generation utilities derived from it.
I have left substantial documentation in the README of the conversion
directory, including the recommended approach that we will take to keep
building this out.
(note that this organizes the code to coincide with the refactoring in
#2442 versus the current flat arrangement)
saienduri
Ashay Rane
Ben Vanik
Rob Suderman
Quinn Dawkins
Vivek Khandelwal
Gaurav Shukla
Andreas Falkenberg
Phaneesh Barwaria
Chi_Liu
James Newling
aldesilv
Xida Ren (Cedar)
John Wu
Gaurav Shukla
Stella Laurenzo