While playing with TorchDynamo on ResNet18. I notice following issues:
- `prims.convert_element_type` can’t be canonicalized even if the input
and the output share the same type
- `aten.max_pool2d_with_indices` is always used instead of
`aten.max_pool2d`, even if the second returned output (indices) has no
user
This PR fixes above issues by adding a folder to the
PrimsConvertElementTypeOp and a canonicalizer to the
AtenMaxPool2dWithIndicesOp
Lit test:
`cmake --build build --target check-torch-mlir-all`
---------
Co-authored-by: Ze Zhang <ze.zhang@getcruise.com>
This is probably a decent PR for learning about blocks and regions.
If you're here to learn about that, consider also looking at
lib/Conversion/TorchToSCF/TorchToSCF.cpp
While this doesn't include an e2e test, it is tested downstream in
https://github.com/nod-ai/SHARK-TestSuite/blob/main/e2eshark/onnx/operators/If/model.py
---------
Co-authored-by: Xida Ren <xida.ren.dev@gmail.com>
I spent a little while debugging numerics issues with some tests similar
to the ones in quantized_models.py, only to find that pytorch's
quantized conv transpose is catastrophically inaccurate. I'll upstream
the issue and only leave the tests here which are of the form quantize
-> dequantize -> op.
This is a large change because prior to this point, Python files in the
project were not consistently formatted. This reformats them all with
black defaults.
Based on experience with prior projects, if you have a dev/long-term
branch with Python patches, you can minimize merge conflicts prior to
rebasing to include this commit by running `black` on your modified
Python files, squashing, and then rebasing/merging.
A choice was made to quantize the return type of Relu with a scale and
zero point copied from the input's quantization scheme. With this
choice, the torch-to-linalg conversion of quantized Relu essentially
computes max(input, zeroPoint) in the elementwise payload.
* promote input to output element-type when lowering to stablehlo, so
that it could satisfy stablehlo's type constraints.
* split promote-to-fp unary ops from fp-only unary ops.
This commit also cleans up the OnnxToTorch lowering for the Squeeze and
Unsqueeze op and adds the support for handling edge cases.
Signed-Off By: Vivek Khandelwal <vivekkhandelwal1424@gmail.com>
Version number was set too high. Lowered to support more cases allows
more tests to pass.
Co-authored-by: Robert Suderman <rsuderman@Roberts-MacBook-Pro.local>
Previous implementation erroneously mixed up num_outputs with
slice_size. New version correctly computs the slice size and directly
performs slicing rather than leveraging `aten.split.tensor`. This is due
to `onnx` supporting a fixed number of splits making the size
computation more easily computeable when lowering to `aten` rather than
deferring to `aten.split.tensor`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Suderman <rsuderman@Roberts-MacBook-Pro.local>
We can map to `tensor.reshape` for handling multiple output dynamic
shapes. Later we can perform a more complex analysis for indentifying
expand/collapse cases from the tensor.reshape.
Initially we planned to handle this identification at the `torch` level
however it will be easier to handle once converted to core
mlir-dialects.
Decomposition RepeatInterleaveSelfInt with following ops:
```python
def my_repeat_interleave(input, repeats, dim=None):
if dim is None:
# Flatten the input and then repeat
return input.flatten().unsqueeze(-1).tile((1, repeats)).flatten()
else:
# Calculate the shape after repeat
expanded_shape = list(input.shape)
expanded_shape[dim] *= repeats
# Repeat the tensor along the specified dimension
repeat_shape = [1] * (input.dim() + 1)
repeat_shape[dim + 1] = repeats
input = input.unsqueeze(-1)
# Tile and then reshape
tiled = torch.tile(input, repeat_shape)
# Rearrange and reshape
repeated = tiled.reshape(*expanded_shape)
return repeated
```
I passed the tests of stablehlo and linalg. When testing onnx, strange
things happened.
In torch-mlir's CI **torch_nightly** and my own
environment(torch==2.4.0.dev20240318+cpu), it can **pass the pass**.
In torch-mlir's CI **torch_stable**, it **failed**.
The test case is `RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic`, the result
shape should be [120].
```python
class RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
@export
@annotate_args([
None,
([3, 4, 5], torch.float32, True),
])
def forward(self, x):
return x.repeat_interleave(2)
@register_test_case(module_factory=lambda: RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule())
def RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic(module, tu: TestUtils):
module.forward(tu.rand(3, 4, 5))
```
The error log is as follows:
```
Unexpected outcome summary: (onnx)
****** Failed tests - 1 tests
FAIL - "RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic"
@ trace item #0 - call to "forward"
@ output of call to "forward"
ERROR: shape (torch.Size([6, 4, 5])) is not equal to golden shape (torch.Size([120]))
```
@rsuderman
Would you please help me check what's wrong with my PR? Thanks a lot.
NeverRaR
Vivek Khandelwal
penguin_wwy
Jiawei Wu
Xinyu Yang
zjgarvey
Ze Zhang
Prashant Kumar
Xida Ren (Cedar)
Yuanqiang Liu
Stella Laurenzo
Rob Suderman
Vinayak Dev