…cation and sparse tensors.
**NOTE**: This PR _doges_ the issue in buffer-deallocation pass instead
of resolving it. In the future, we need to fix the bug in
buffer-deallocation pass when handling code generated by sparse
compiler.
This is probably a decent PR for learning about blocks and regions.
If you're here to learn about that, consider also looking at
lib/Conversion/TorchToSCF/TorchToSCF.cpp
While this doesn't include an e2e test, it is tested downstream in
https://github.com/nod-ai/SHARK-TestSuite/blob/main/e2eshark/onnx/operators/If/model.py
---------
Co-authored-by: Xida Ren <xida.ren.dev@gmail.com>
I spent a little while debugging numerics issues with some tests similar
to the ones in quantized_models.py, only to find that pytorch's
quantized conv transpose is catastrophically inaccurate. I'll upstream
the issue and only leave the tests here which are of the form quantize
-> dequantize -> op.
For some sparse programs (and I am sure other not-seen corner cases for
dense), some passes were missing in the reference pipeline, eventually
resulting in e.g. a unresolved unrealized cast issue. This PR adds some
very obvious missing passes to avoid this situation.
This is a large change because prior to this point, Python files in the
project were not consistently formatted. This reformats them all with
black defaults.
Based on experience with prior projects, if you have a dev/long-term
branch with Python patches, you can minimize merge conflicts prior to
rebasing to include this commit by running `black` on your modified
Python files, squashing, and then rebasing/merging.
A choice was made to quantize the return type of Relu with a scale and
zero point copied from the input's quantization scheme. With this
choice, the torch-to-linalg conversion of quantized Relu essentially
computes max(input, zeroPoint) in the elementwise payload.
We can map to `tensor.reshape` for handling multiple output dynamic
shapes. Later we can perform a more complex analysis for indentifying
expand/collapse cases from the tensor.reshape.
Initially we planned to handle this identification at the `torch` level
however it will be easier to handle once converted to core
mlir-dialects.
Decomposition RepeatInterleaveSelfInt with following ops:
```python
def my_repeat_interleave(input, repeats, dim=None):
if dim is None:
# Flatten the input and then repeat
return input.flatten().unsqueeze(-1).tile((1, repeats)).flatten()
else:
# Calculate the shape after repeat
expanded_shape = list(input.shape)
expanded_shape[dim] *= repeats
# Repeat the tensor along the specified dimension
repeat_shape = [1] * (input.dim() + 1)
repeat_shape[dim + 1] = repeats
input = input.unsqueeze(-1)
# Tile and then reshape
tiled = torch.tile(input, repeat_shape)
# Rearrange and reshape
repeated = tiled.reshape(*expanded_shape)
return repeated
```
I passed the tests of stablehlo and linalg. When testing onnx, strange
things happened.
In torch-mlir's CI **torch_nightly** and my own
environment(torch==2.4.0.dev20240318+cpu), it can **pass the pass**.
In torch-mlir's CI **torch_stable**, it **failed**.
The test case is `RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic`, the result
shape should be [120].
```python
class RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
@export
@annotate_args([
None,
([3, 4, 5], torch.float32, True),
])
def forward(self, x):
return x.repeat_interleave(2)
@register_test_case(module_factory=lambda: RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule())
def RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic(module, tu: TestUtils):
module.forward(tu.rand(3, 4, 5))
```
The error log is as follows:
```
Unexpected outcome summary: (onnx)
****** Failed tests - 1 tests
FAIL - "RepeatInterleaveSelfIntNoDimModule_basic"
@ trace item #0 - call to "forward"
@ output of call to "forward"
ERROR: shape (torch.Size([6, 4, 5])) is not equal to golden shape (torch.Size([120]))
```
@rsuderman
Would you please help me check what's wrong with my PR? Thanks a lot.
Align corner modes which select what the corners mean.
Either the center of the corner points or the edges of the edge points.
---------
Co-authored-by: Rob Suderman <rob.suderman@gmail.com>
The new cases added for quantized matmuls are:
1. vec-vec
2. vec-mat
3. mat-vec
each of which are now lowered to expand(s), quantized_matmul, and
collapse.
1. onnx.MatMulInteger now converts to aten.matmul instead of aten.mm
2. aten.matmul, for ranks >=2, now allows quantized inputs and will
lower to linalg::quantized_matmul or linalg::quantized_batch_matmul.
3. added AtenMatmulOp to the FuseQuantizeOps rewrite patters
QuantizeOperands, QuantizeTransposedOperands, and QuantizeAccumulator
4. added several tests, including some to test AtenMmOp with varying
quantization signed-ness.
5. a quantized matmul mat-vec test is added to verify the failure to
lower to linalg; cleaned of out-of-date code related to common
torch-mlir lowering xfails.
6. in debugging a real model with quantized matmuls, I found a bug on
the scalarize-shapes pass which resulted from the aten.full op folder
returning an incompatible result type. This is fixed by the small change
here to
[lib/Dialect/Torch/IR/TorchOps.cpp](https://github.com/llvm/torch-mlir/compare/main...zjgarvey:torch-mlir:MatMulIntegerFix?expand=1#diff-dc8ed165c207918e606490eee3984b1ad51d7034e6aac36fc046bf47f6f03f4f).
- Added linalg lowering for `AtenFloorDivideScalarOp`
- Needed `AtenDivScalarModeOp` for the decomp.
- Added linalg lowering for `AtenDivScalarModeOp`
- Moved linalg payload logic to `createDivModePayload()` since the logic
was nearly identical for both `AtenDivScalarModeOp` and
`AtenDivTensorModeOp`. Just a template function
- Added `AtenDivScalarModeOp` lowering for stablehlo
Pytorch's
[`torch.floor_divide()`](https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.floor_divide.html)
in a previous version (for a reason unknown to me) preformed a
truncation instead of "floor". The already implemented op
`AtenFloorDivideTensorOp` was done before this change. However, this
wasn't caught because our testcases only tested positive floor division.
I changed this to floor as well as adding a few test cases.
If there is only a single value scattered there can be an implicit batch
dimension. This includes a check for the implicit batch dimension when
reshaping the update tensor. It includes an e2e test to verify
correctness.
Fix the case PrimListUnpackOp's result num is not equal to PrimList
length.
See the following example:
```python
def forward(self, x):
if len(x.shape) == 5:
b0, t, c0, h0, w0 = x.shape
b, c, h, w = torch.mul(b0, t), c0, h0, w0
else:
b1, c1, h1, w1 = x.shape
b, c, h, w = b1, c1, h1, w1
res = torch.reshape(x, [b, c, h, w])
return res
```
Without this fix, the following error message will occur：
```
/root/torch-mlir/externals/llvm-project/mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:118: virtual void mlir::RewriterBase::replaceOp(mlir::Operation *, mlir::ValueRange): Assertion `op->getNumResults() == newValues.size() && "incorrect # of replacement values"' failed.
```
Previously, it could only handle the situations where outputsize == (1,
1) or outputsize == (input_H, input_W). Now it supports all situations
where input_H % output_H== 0 && input_W % output_W == 0
1. Changes the linalg lowering for dequantization ops to always sign
cast to float to prevent misrepresenting uint32 overflow on subtraction
with zero point.
2. Adds a basic quantized model test which only quantizes and
dequantizes and now passes with these changes in linalg and onnx
configs.
3. Changes the aten.mm lowering to allow mismatched quantized types.
4. If a quantized matmul arg is uint8, we shift by 128 to faithfully
represent the quantization as a signed i8 quantization. This worked fine
in the AtenMmOp lowering, but I'd be happy to move it to a rewrite in
FuseQuantizedOps.cpp instead if that seems more appropriate.
With the changes 3 and 4, the QuantizedMLP_basic and
QuantizedSingleLayer_basic e2e tests now passes with the onnx config.
This PR only performs a lit test. In lieu of an e2e test, https://github.com/nod-ai/SHARK-TestSuite/pull/142 makede sure that the lowering works & the numbers check out.
Co-authored-by: Xida Ren <xida.ren.dev@gmail.com>
Suraj Sudhir
Xinyu Yang
Peiming Liu
Andreas Falkenberg
NeverRaR
penguin_wwy
zjgarvey
Prashant Kumar
Xida Ren (Cedar)
Aart Bik
Yuanqiang Liu
Stella Laurenzo
Rob Suderman
IanWood1
Xinan Jiang(姜曦楠)